Affirmative Action in the Forensic Arena: Pakistan's Perspective
Being a weaker stratum of society, special measures should be taken to protect women and children. It is a basic obligation of all and sundry to safeguard and uplift women and children, but in the Courts of Law, they are the least protected. When the stage of realization of the basic rights comes, the Courts treat them like chattels on one pretext or other, especially on the ground of judicial restraint. They are not given equal treatment with men; what to say about special treatment in the Courts in Pakistan. Although on paper, women and children are the most privileged persons at the end of the day, they are victims of the men-made game. Everyone has been watching it since the creation of Pakistan and will continue seeing it forever. This article will explore the fraud being played on women and children from a forensic perspective.
-
Children, Forensic, Judicial Restraint, Women
-
(1) Mumtaz Ali
PhD (Law) Scholar, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
(2) Aziz-ur-Rehman
Associate Professor of Law, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
- Ahmad, J. Z. Vs The Secretary Revenue Division Islamabad. (2007). PTD (Trib) 2319.
- Austen, J. (1813). Pride and Prejudice. T. Egerton & Whitehall.
- Beckett, S. (1954). Waiting for Godot. New York's Grove Press
- Chadwick, A. (1960). Waiting for Godot: A Logical Approach. Symposium: A Quarterly Journal in Modern Literatures.
- Cohen, M. J. (1960). The Penguin Dictionary of Quotations. London: The Penguin Books.
- Dr Shahnawaz, W. Vs Federation of Pakistan. (2012). PLC (C.S.) 1052.
- Elahi, N. Vs Government of the Punjab etc. (2013). CLC 1457.
- Ex-parte Virginia. (1879). 100 US 339.
- Faiz, A. F. (1996). Dawn of Freedom. Center for South Asia.
- Gatron (Industries) Ltd. v. Government of Pakistan. (1999). SCMR 1072.
- Government of the Punjab, Secretary Home Department through Deputy Secretary (Police) Interior Department, Lahore etc. Vs Fatima, Q. etc, (2018). PLJ Lah 341.
- Hardy, T. (1981). Tess of the d'Urbervilles. McIlvaine & Co.
- Hemingway, E. (1926). The Sun also Rises. Scribner's.
- Ilyas, M. Vs Begum, M. etc. (2020). YLR 2344.
- Jan, F. Vs Din, R. (1990). PLD SC 661.
- Jan, F. Vs Din, R. (1992). PLD SC 811.
- Khan, A. B. Vs Federation of Pakistan. (2001). SCMR 1161.
- Khan, H. Vs Pakistan. (1992). PLJ SC 591.
- Khan, R. Vs Province of Sindh. (2012). YLR 1801.
- Mansoor, A. S. (2006). Salvaging Democracy: Judiciary Our Last Hope. International Judicial Conference.
- Manto, S. H. (1977). New Constitution. Cultural Institute of Pakistan.
- Martin, F. F. (2006). International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: Treaties, Cases, and Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Meek, R. L., Raphael, D. D., Stein, P. G. (Eds). (1982). Lectures on Jurisprudence. London: Oxford University Press.
- Irshad Mai v. Additional District Judge. (1997). PLJ Lah 1631.
- Parton, J. (1979). The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. New York: Dell Publishing Co., Inc.
- Report No. 33 of 1955.
- Rosenfeld, D. (2007). Women's Rights Guide. Cambridge, MA.
- Syeda, S. Vs Bahauddin Zakariya University etc. (2011). YLR 2867.
- Shakespeare, W. (2012). Hamlet. Simon & Schuster.
- Shakespeare, W. (2012). Macbeth. Simon & Schuster.
- Sherwani, A. Vs Government of Pakistan. (1991). SCMR 1041.
- Syeda, S. Vs Bahauddin Zakariya University. (2012). PLJ Lahore 64.
- The Code of Civil Procedure, Act V of 1908, (1908)
- The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (1973).
- The Family Courts (Amendment) Ordinance (2002).
- The Punjab Family Courts (Amendment) Act (2015).
- UN Charter of 1945, (1945).
- Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1997 SC 3011.
- West Pakistan Act No. I of 1969, (1969).
- West Pakistan Act No. VII of 1997, (1997).
- West Pakistan Act No. X of 1996, (1996).
- West Pakistan Ordinance II of 1962, (1962)
- West Pakistan Ordinance of 2002, (2002).
- Withanage, I. H. (2011). Waiting for Nothing. University of Iceland.
Cite this article
-
APA : Ali, M., & Aziz-ur-Rehman. (2021). Affirmative Action in the Forensic Arena: Pakistan's Perspective. Global Legal Studies Review, VI(I), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2021(VI-I).07
-
CHICAGO : Ali, Mumtaz, and Aziz-ur-Rehman. 2021. "Affirmative Action in the Forensic Arena: Pakistan's Perspective." Global Legal Studies Review, VI (I): 46-53 doi: 10.31703/glsr.2021(VI-I).07
-
HARVARD : ALI, M. & AZIZ-UR-REHMAN. 2021. Affirmative Action in the Forensic Arena: Pakistan's Perspective. Global Legal Studies Review, VI, 46-53.
-
MHRA : Ali, Mumtaz, and Aziz-ur-Rehman. 2021. "Affirmative Action in the Forensic Arena: Pakistan's Perspective." Global Legal Studies Review, VI: 46-53
-
MLA : Ali, Mumtaz, and Aziz-ur-Rehman. "Affirmative Action in the Forensic Arena: Pakistan's Perspective." Global Legal Studies Review, VI.I (2021): 46-53 Print.
-
OXFORD : Ali, Mumtaz and Aziz-ur-Rehman, (2021), "Affirmative Action in the Forensic Arena: Pakistan's Perspective", Global Legal Studies Review, VI (I), 46-53
-
TURABIAN : Ali, Mumtaz, and Aziz-ur-Rehman. "Affirmative Action in the Forensic Arena: Pakistan's Perspective." Global Legal Studies Review VI, no. I (2021): 46-53. https://doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2021(VI-I).07