http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2023(VIII-IV).02
10.31703/glsr.2023(VIII-IV).02
Published : Dec 2023
Constitutional Framework: A Comparative Analysis of Legal Systems in Pakistan and the United States
Constitution means that principles on which state regulate organized and determine relationship through their subjects of states. Constitution may in form of written and unwritten to some extend we can say that Constitution of Pakistan and America are written Constitutions but United Kingdom’s Constitution is unwritten Constitution. Constitution is a comprehensive code which consists on Preamble, introduction, parts that parts consist on chapter and Constitution also define the fundamental right of subjects of state, Principals of polices, mechanism of election and procedure of Amendment into the Constitution by legislation. Judicial Review is of one the impressive and incomparable silent feature of the Constitution. According to this principle no one use Excessive power regarding his authority.
-
Comparative Analysis, Legal Systems, Pakistan, United States
-
(1) Shahid Rizwan
Assistant Professor, College of Law, Government College University, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.
- Allan, T. R. S. (1985b). Legislative Supremacy and the Rule of Law: Democracy and Constitutionalism. The Cambridge Law Journal, 44(1), 111–143. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197300114461
- Asmal, K., Asmal, L., & Roberts, R. (1996). Reconciliation through truth : a reckoning of apartheid’s criminal governance. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA38780562
- Brennan, W. J. (2017). The Constitution of the United States: Contemporary Ratification. In CQ Press eBooks (pp. 230–241). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071800942.n25
- Choudhury, G. W. (1956). The Constitution of Pakistan. Pacific Affairs, 29(3), 243. https://doi.org/10.2307/2753474
- Currie, D. P. (1983). The Constitution in the Supreme Court: Article IV and Federal Powers, 1836-1864. Duke Law Journal, 1983(4), 695. https://doi.org/10.2307/1372464
- Epstein, L., Knight, J., & Shvetsova, O. (2001). The role of constitutional courts in the establishment and maintenance of democratic systems of government. Law & Society Review, 35(1), 117– 163. https://doi.org/10.2307/3185388
- Fiss, O. M. (1979). The Supreme Court, 1978 term. Harvard Law Review, 93(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/1340507
- Goodpaster, G. S. (1973). The Constitution and Fundamental Rights. Ariz. L. Rev., 15, 479.
- Jaffe, L. L. (1961b). Standing to secure judicial review: private actions. Harvard Law Review, 75(2), 255. https://doi.org/10.2307/1338717
- Jum, O. (2010). Constitutional law
- Lau, M. (2006). The role of Islam in the legal system of Pakistan. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004149274.i-250
- Mehfooz, M. (2021). Religious freedom in Pakistan: A case study of religious minorities. Religions (Basel), 12(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12010051
- Nadeem, A. H. (2020). Pakistan: The politics of the misgoverned. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL28079565M/Pakistan
- Nelson, C. (2008). Judicial review of legislative purpose. Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID1136125_code104659.pdf?abstractid=1136125&rulid=10157729&mirid=1
- Posner, E. A., & Sunstein, C. R. (2006). Chevronizing foreign relations law. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.901999
- Prakash, S., & Yoo, J. (2003). The origins of judicial review. the University of Chicago Law Review, 70(3), 887. https://doi.org/10.2307/1600662
- Rawle, W. H. (1970). A view of the Constitution of the United States of America. https://www.cap-press.com/pdf/1813.pdf
- Reynolds, L. (2004). Taxes, fees, assessments, dues, and the get what you pay for model of local government. Fla. L. Rev., 56, 373.
- Rosenfeld, M. (1984). Contract and justice: The relation between classical contract law and social contract theory. Iowa L. Rev., 70, 769.
- Roznai, Y. (2013). Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments—The migration and success of a constitutional idea. the American Journal of Comparative Law, 61(3), 657–719. https://doi.org/10.5131/ajcl.2012.0027
- Shapiro, M. (1999). The success of judicial review. In Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (pp. 193–219). https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333982518_9
Cite this article
-
APA : Rizwan, S. (2023). Constitutional Framework: A Comparative Analysis of Legal Systems in Pakistan and the United States. Global Legal Studies Review, VIII(IV), 10-15. https://doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2023(VIII-IV).02
-
CHICAGO : Rizwan, Shahid. 2023. "Constitutional Framework: A Comparative Analysis of Legal Systems in Pakistan and the United States." Global Legal Studies Review, VIII (IV): 10-15 doi: 10.31703/glsr.2023(VIII-IV).02
-
HARVARD : RIZWAN, S. 2023. Constitutional Framework: A Comparative Analysis of Legal Systems in Pakistan and the United States. Global Legal Studies Review, VIII, 10-15.
-
MHRA : Rizwan, Shahid. 2023. "Constitutional Framework: A Comparative Analysis of Legal Systems in Pakistan and the United States." Global Legal Studies Review, VIII: 10-15
-
MLA : Rizwan, Shahid. "Constitutional Framework: A Comparative Analysis of Legal Systems in Pakistan and the United States." Global Legal Studies Review, VIII.IV (2023): 10-15 Print.
-
OXFORD : Rizwan, Shahid (2023), "Constitutional Framework: A Comparative Analysis of Legal Systems in Pakistan and the United States", Global Legal Studies Review, VIII (IV), 10-15
-
TURABIAN : Rizwan, Shahid. "Constitutional Framework: A Comparative Analysis of Legal Systems in Pakistan and the United States." Global Legal Studies Review VIII, no. IV (2023): 10-15. https://doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2023(VIII-IV).02