ARTICLE

DIVULGING ON AUTOPSY AND THE EXTERNAL POSTMORTEM EXAMINATION OF A DEAD BODY FOR CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

16 Pages : 128 - 138

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2020(V-III).16      10.31703/glsr.2020(V-III).16      Published : Sep 2020

Divulging on Autopsy and the External Post-Mortem Examination of a Dead Body for Criminal Proceedings

    For criminal proceedings, the post-mortem examination of a dead body is composed of two stages.PME encompasses the apparent condition of the dead body in reference to the surrounding of the crime scene and the effects of the environment. The autopsy consists of the examination of the body in the autopsy room for detailed examination. Apart from these two categories, PME can also be divided according to the purpose and approval of authority for conducting the examination including; for the training of the medical students,organ donation, and identification of an unknown dead body where no crime is involved, or where the crime occurred it determines the cause of death or traces any sign of the criminal. The purpose of both examinations is to find the cause of death and trace the perpetrator of the crime, if possible under the given circumstances of dead body, and to prosecute the offender and exonerate the innocents.

    Autopsy Examination, Autopsy Surgeon, Rigor Mortis, Livor Mortis, Dead Body
    (1) Atika Lohani
    Assistant Professor, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (2) Shahid Zafar Bajwa
    Advocate High Court
    (3) Aamir Abbas
    Assistant Professor, Law College, GC University, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Amir Khan vs. District Magistrate Chakwal, PLJ 1998 LHC 276.
  • Australian Museum. (2015). Decomposition: Fly life cycle and development times.
  • Beachum vs. State, ( Tex. App., 2017).
  • Blaikie vs. Callahan, 691 F.2d 64 ( C.A.1 (Mass.), 1982.
  • Burton E. C. (2002). The autopsy: a professional responsibility in assuring quality of care. American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality, 17(2), 56-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/106286060201700203.
  • Chuckrow, R. (1997). The Intelligent Dieter's Guide, Rising Mist Publications, Briarcliff Manor, NY.
  • Com. vs. Morris, 958 A.2d 569, 2008 PA Super 235
  • Dix, J. (2000). Color Atlas of Forensic pathology,1st edn., Washington, DC.
  • Ex Parte Swearingen, (Tex. Crim. App., 2009)
  • Margaret Faye Litchfield vs. The State of Texas, No. 06-17-00007-CR, Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana, 2017.
  • Massie vs. State, 349 Md. 834, 709 A.2d 1321 (Md., 1997).
  • Merriam-Webster. (2018). Medical Definition of livor mortis.
  • Muhammad Pervaiz vs. State, PLJ 2005 Cr.C.1088.
  • Nicholas Gerbis, (2010). What exactly do they do during an Autopsy?' Life Science. (2018)
  • Saukko, P., & Knight, B. (2016). Forensic Pathology, 4th edn., New York, p. 19-21.
  • Schäfer, A. (2000). Colour measurements of pallor mortis. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 113(2), 81-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00007713.
  • Shipley vs. City of NY, 16 N.Y.S.3d 1 (NY, 2015)
  • Shojania, K. G., Burton, E. C., McDonald, K. M., & Goldman, L. (2003). Changes in rates of autopsy- detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review. JAMA, 289(21), 2849-2856. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.21.2849
  • Simpson, C. K. (2011). Simpson's Forensic Medicine, 13th ed., London.
  • State of Illinois vs. Nathaniel R. LEGORE, 2013 996 N.E.2d 148.
  • State vs. Brown, 158 A.3d 501 (Me., 2017).
  • State vs. Hatfield, 155 So.3d 585 ( La. App. 4 Cir., 2014).
  • State vs. Poteat ( N.C. App., 2011).
  • State vs. Rawlins, (Tenn. Crim. App., 2007).
  • State vs. Scheffield, (2017). Ohio 2593.
  • State vs. Swearingen, ( Tex. Crim. App. 2015).
  • The People vs. Jammie Henrix, B190607, Court of Appeals of California, Second Appellate District, Division Three, 2007.
  • The People vs. Ubaldo Sanchez, H040503, Court of Appeal of the State of California Sixth Appellate District 2016.
  • Thompson vs. State, 2015 Ark. App. 486 (Ark. App., 2015).
  • Valdes, R., Kiger, P. J., (2018). How Autopsies Work.
  • Waters, B. L. (2009). Handbook of autopsy practice, 4th edn. United States.

Cite this article

    APA : Lohani, A., Bajwa, S. Z., & Abbas, A. (2020). Divulging on Autopsy and the External Post-Mortem Examination of a Dead Body for Criminal Proceedings. Global Legal Studies Review, V(III), 128 - 138. https://doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2020(V-III).16
    CHICAGO : Lohani, Atika, Shahid Zafar Bajwa, and Aamir Abbas. 2020. "Divulging on Autopsy and the External Post-Mortem Examination of a Dead Body for Criminal Proceedings." Global Legal Studies Review, V (III): 128 - 138 doi: 10.31703/glsr.2020(V-III).16
    HARVARD : LOHANI, A., BAJWA, S. Z. & ABBAS, A. 2020. Divulging on Autopsy and the External Post-Mortem Examination of a Dead Body for Criminal Proceedings. Global Legal Studies Review, V, 128 - 138.
    MHRA : Lohani, Atika, Shahid Zafar Bajwa, and Aamir Abbas. 2020. "Divulging on Autopsy and the External Post-Mortem Examination of a Dead Body for Criminal Proceedings." Global Legal Studies Review, V: 128 - 138
    MLA : Lohani, Atika, Shahid Zafar Bajwa, and Aamir Abbas. "Divulging on Autopsy and the External Post-Mortem Examination of a Dead Body for Criminal Proceedings." Global Legal Studies Review, V.III (2020): 128 - 138 Print.
    OXFORD : Lohani, Atika, Bajwa, Shahid Zafar, and Abbas, Aamir (2020), "Divulging on Autopsy and the External Post-Mortem Examination of a Dead Body for Criminal Proceedings", Global Legal Studies Review, V (III), 128 - 138
    TURABIAN : Lohani, Atika, Shahid Zafar Bajwa, and Aamir Abbas. "Divulging on Autopsy and the External Post-Mortem Examination of a Dead Body for Criminal Proceedings." Global Legal Studies Review V, no. III (2020): 128 - 138. https://doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2020(V-III).16