ARTICLE

FORENSIC EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN PAKISTAN

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

04 Pages : 25-31

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2022(VII-III).04      10.31703/glsr.2022(VII-III).04      Published : Sep 2022

Forensic Evidence in Criminal Justice System in Pakistan

Abstract

    Forensic evidence is holding an important position in criminal justice systems all over the world. It is not only relevant in a criminal investigation but also in prosecution. The role of forensic evidence in the criminal justice system in Pakistan has increased significantly due to the advancement in forensic science. The courts in Pakistan are relying heavily on forensic evidence in relevant matters. The main objective of this research is to discuss the role, importance, nature, and the evidentiary value of forensic evidence with respect to the criminal justice system in Pakistan. It is found that the role of forensic evidence in Pakistan is not at par with the modern world as it is not being properly used in Pakistan. There is a dire need to improve legislation, institutional structure and stakeholders' capacity dealing with forensic evidence in the light of the recommendations made in this study.

    Criminal, Evidence, Forensic, Investigation

    (1) Ali Ajmal
    LL.M, University Law College, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (2) Faiza Rasool
    Research Scholar, Institute of Applied Psychology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Fulltext PDF

References

  • Abdul Ghafar Ansari v State. (2016). MLD 546.
  • Adnan Hussain v The State. (2018). YLR 1412.
  • Ahmad Sher v State. (2016). YLR 2476.
  • Ali, S. A & Woodroffe, J. G. (1907). The Law of Evidence Applicable in British India (4th Ed, Pp. 296-297). Calcutta: Thacker, Spink & Co.
  • Amjad Wali v State. (2014). YLR 1503.
  • Arif ud Din v State. (2013). PCrLJ 1129.
  • Article 164 of Qanoon-e- Shahadat Order 1984.
  • Article 59 of Qanoon-e- Shahadat Order 1984.
  • Aslam Surhiani v The State. (2017). PCrLJ 174.
  • Assadullah v State. (2016). PCrLJ 1698.
  • Atta ur Rehman v State. (2018). PCrLJ 276.
  • Bilal Mehmood v The State. (2018). MLD 1559.
  • Clancy, D., & Bull, R. (2014). The Effect on Mock-Juror Decision-Making of Power-of-Speech Within Eyewitness Testimony and Types of Scientific Evidence. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 22(3), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2014.960029
  • Dilawar Mehmood Alias Dulli v The State. (2015). YLR 805.
  • Ehsanullah v State. (2010). PCrLJ 1415.
  • Farooq, A., & Waheed, U. (2013). Forensics: An Emerging Science in Pakistan. The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, 34(4), 374–375. https://doi.org/10.1097/paf.0000000000000050
  • Fisher, B. A. J. (2004). Techniques of Crime Scene Investigation (7th ed.). New York, NY: CRC Press.
  • Freeman, N. J., & Punzo, D. L. D. (2001). Effects of DNA and Eyewitness Evidence on Juror Decisions. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 6(3), 109– 117. https://doi.org/10.24839/1089-4136.jn6.3.109.
  • Gardner, R. M. (2004). Practical Crime Scene Processing and Investigation. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.
  • Garner, B. A., & Black, H. C. (1999). Black's law dictionary. St. Paul, MN: Thomson Reuters.
  • Ghulam Rabbani v The State. (2000). YLR 1580.
  • Grover, R. & Murphy, P. (2013). Murphy on Evidence (13th ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Habib Khyzer v The State. (2016). YLR 393.
  • Hans, V. P., Kaye, D. H., Dann, B. M., Farley, E. J., & Albertson, S. (2011). Science in the jury box: Jurors’ comprehension of mitochondrial DNA evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 35(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9222-8.
  • Inayatullah Alias Zahid Alias Farho Chandio v State. (2016). PCrLJ Note 10.
  • Intekhab Ahmad Abbasi v The State. (2018). SCMR 495.
  • Ismail Parvez Minhas v The State. (2018). YLR Note 119.
  • Jalal v State. (2013). YLR 961.
  • Javed Iqbal v State. (2016). SCMR 787.
  • Kashif Nawaz v The State. (2018). YLR 1084.
  • Khalid Rasheed v State. (2012). MLD 1274.
  • Khuda Bakhsh v State. (2002). YLR 2160.
  • huram Jalali v The State. (2017). PCrLJ Note 19.
  • Kiely, T. F. (2001). Forensic evidence: Science and the criminal law. CRC Press.
  • Lee, H. C., Palmbach, T. M., & Miller, M. T. (2004). Henry Lee's Crime Scene Handbook. San Diego, California: Elsevier Academic press.
  • Lieberman, J. D., Carrell, C. A., Miethe, T. D., & Krauss, D. A. (2008). Gold versus platinum: Do jurors recognize the superiority and limitations of DNA evidence compared to other types of forensic evidence? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14(1), 27–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.14.1.27
  • Ling, S., Kaplan, J., & Berryessa, C. (2020). The Importance of Forensic Evidence on Decisions of Criminal Guilt. Science & Justice, 61(2), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2020.11.004
  • Maeder, E. M., Ewanation, L. A., & Monnink, J. (2016). Jurors’ Perceptions of Evidence: The Relative Influence of DNA and Eyewitness Testimony when Presented by Opposing Parties. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 32(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9194-9
  • Manzoor Ahmad Alias Mavia Alias Usama Alias Habibullah v The State. (2018). MLD 1512.
  • Mateen, R. M., Tariq, A., & Rasool, N. (2018). Forensic science in Pakistan; present and future. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences 8(1), 1-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-018-0077-3
  • McEwen, T. (2010). The role and impact of forensic evidence in the criminal justice system. National Institute of Justice. Inc. 1219 Prince Street, Suite 2 Alexandria, Virginia. Retrieved from: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/236474.pdf
  • McEwen, T., & Regoeczi, W. (2015). Forensic Evidence in Homicide Investigations and Prosecutions. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 60(5), 1188–1198.
  • Muhammad Amin v State PLD. (2006). SC 219.
  • Muhammad Ayoob v State. (2012). PCrLJ 1438.
  • Muhammad Ayyaz v The State. (2017). PCrLJ Note 29
  • Muhammad Fayyaz v The State. (2018). YLR 1377.
  • Muhammad Hayat v The State. (2018). PCrLJ Note 61.
  • Muhammad Imran v The State. (2017). YLR 2394.
  • Muhammad Irfan v The State. (2016). PCrLJ 1178.
  • Muhammad Khan v State. (2013). YLR 491.
  • Muhammad Qaiser v State. (2006). YLR 3158.
  • Muhammad Rizwan v The State. (2016). YLR Note 102.
  • Muhammad Safeer v The State. (2017). PCrLJ 1435.
  • Muhammad Umair v The State. (2017). YLR 1097.
  • Mukhtar Alias Mokhi v The State. (2018). YLR 1302.
  • Murphy, E. E. (2015). Inside the cell : the dark side of forensic DNA. Nation Books.
  • Muttiullah Khan Vs State. (2002). YLR 3808 609.
  • Narejo, N., & Avais, M. A. (2012). Examining the role of forensic science for the investigative solution of crimes. Sindh University Research Journal (Science Series) 44(2), 251- 254. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2431586
  • Nasir Abbas v The State. (2015). YLR 629.
  • Nasir Mehmood v State. (2015). SCMR 423.
  • NFSA. (2017). National Forensic Science Agency. https://www.nfsa.gov.pk
  • Niaz Alias Niazzo v State. (2015). YLR 2255.
  • O’Neill Shermer, L., Rose, K. C., & Hoffman, A. (2011). Perceptions and Credibility: Understanding the Nuances of Eyewitness Testimony. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 27(2), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986211405886
  • Omair Ali v The State. (2018). PCrLJ 1224.
  • Pearson, J. M., Law, J. R., Skene, J. A. G., Beskind, D. H., Vidmar, N., Ball, D. A., Malekpour, A., Carter, R. M., & Skene, J. H. P. (2018). Modelling the effects of crime type and evidence on judgments about guilt. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(11), 856–866. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0451-z.
  • PFSA. (2018). Punjab Forensic Science Agency, Government of The Punjab. https://pfsa.punjab.gov.pk
  • Pirzada Alias Peer v The State. (2017). PCrLJ 605.
  • Powell, E. (1868). Principles & Practice of the Law of Evidence (3rd Ed., Edited by John Cutler and Edmund Fuller Griffin). London: Butterworths.
  • Quadara, A., Fileborn, B., & Parkinson, D. (2013). The role of forensic medical evidence in the prosecution of adult sexual assault. (1st ed.) (ACSSA Issues; No. 15). Australian Centre for the Study of Sexual Assault. https://aifs.gov.au/publications/role%20-forensic%20-medical-evidence-prosecutionadult-sexual-assault
  • Raees Khan Vs State. (2018). MLD 835.
  • Ragle, L. (2002). Crime Scene. New York, NY: Avon Books.
  • Riaz Ali Vs the State. (2016). YLR 78.
  • Rizwan Ahmad Qureshi Vs State. PLD (2017). Sindh 653
  • Roman, J. K., Reid, S., Reid, J., Chalfin, A., Adams, W., & Knight, C. (2008). The DNA field experiment: Cost-effectiveness analysis of the use of DNA in the investigation of high-volume crimes. Washington, DC: Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center.
  • Sadduridin Alias Sadoro vs State. (2015). MLD 1259.
  • Samandar Alias Qurban vs The State. (2017). MLD 539.
  • Sardar Ali vs Special Judge. (1996). MLD 460.
  • Sardar Sher Muhammad vs State. (2007). MLD 252
  • Schweitzer, K., & Nuñez, N. (2018). What Evidence Matters to Jurors? The Prevalence and Importance of Different Homicide Trial Evidence to Mock Jurors. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 25(3), 437–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1437666
  • Shah Izzat Alias Shahzad vs Adnan Constable no. 5355 2017 PCrLJ 25.
  • Shamshad Ahmad vs State PLD. (2004) Lah 368.
  • Shaukat Ali Alias Baba vs State. (2016). PCrLJ Note 33.
  • Sikander Alias Sani vs The State. (2018). MLD 1220.
  • Syed Fida ur Rehman Shah vs State. (2016). PCrLJ 1167.
  • Taj Muhammad Alias Tajo Rind vs The State. (2017). YLR Note 443.
  • Tallat Alias Arshad vs State. (2015). PCrLJ 511.
  • Tanveer Alias Teroo vs State. (2010). YLR 1988.
  • The State vs Ahmad Zaman Khan. (2002). PCrLJ 2041.
  • The State vs Iftekhar Hussain. (2016). GBLR 315.
  • The State vs Muhammad Ramzan. (2012). YLR 2191.
  • The State vs Sadam. (2016). PCrLJ 1815.
  • The State vs Shakeel Ahmad. (2015). MLD 1374.
  • Turvey, B., & Petherick, W. A. (2010). The origins of forensic criminology. In B. Turvey, & C. Ferguson (Eds.), Forensic criminology (pp. xix-xi). Elsevie
  • Waris Ali v State. (2017). SCMR 1572.
  • Wazir vs State. (2016). GBLR 131 Supreme Appellate Court
  • Weizman, E. (2014). Introduction: Forensis. In Forensis: The Architecture of Public Truth, edited by Forensic Architecture, A. Franke, and E. Weizman, 9- 32. Berlin: Sternberg Press.
  • Zahid Hussain vs State. (2005). PCrLJ 1683.
  • Zeeshan Alias Shani vs State. (2012). SCMR 428.

Cite this article

APA

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Ajmal, Ali, and Faiza Rasool. 2022. "Forensic Evidence in Criminal Justice System in Pakistan." Global Legal Studies Review, VII (III): 25-31 doi: 10.31703/glsr.2022(VII-III).04

HARVARD

    HARVARD : AJMAL, A. & RASOOL, F. 2022. Forensic Evidence in Criminal Justice System in Pakistan. Global Legal Studies Review, VII, 25-31.

MHRA

    MHRA : Ajmal, Ali, and Faiza Rasool. 2022. "Forensic Evidence in Criminal Justice System in Pakistan." Global Legal Studies Review, VII: 25-31

MLA

    MLA : Ajmal, Ali, and Faiza Rasool. "Forensic Evidence in Criminal Justice System in Pakistan." Global Legal Studies Review, VII.III (2022): 25-31 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Ajmal, Ali and Rasool, Faiza (2022), "Forensic Evidence in Criminal Justice System in Pakistan", Global Legal Studies Review, VII (III), 25-31

TURABIAN