http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2022(VII-II).07
10.31703/glsr.2022(VII-II).07
Published : Jun 2022
Judicial Activism , Constitutional Challenges in the United States
Mega projects in the State are difficult to be protected under constitutional jurisdiction. It is difficult fora judge to make any decision in the light of a prevailing law legislated by a parliament. The changing image of courts has culminated in the role of the legislature as the subservient organ, which no more remains a supreme body in the State. This factor badly affected the democratic development in the State. This new trend has originated in court-centric and imperialistic judges who have to play their role beyond the constitutional parameters to redress the core issues of society.
-
Judicial Activism, Independence of Judiciary, Colonial Legacies
-
(1) Ahmad Raza
PhD Scholar, Department of Political Science, Qurtuba University of Dera Ismail Khan, KP, Pakistan
(2) Noman Gul
Nawab Allah Nawaz Khan Law College Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, KP, Pakistan
(3) Azmat Ali Shah
Department of Political Science, Qurtuba University of Dera Ismail Khan, KP, Pakistan.
- Bair, J. (2015). The Silent Man: From Lochner to Hammer v. Dagenhart, A Reevaluation of Justice William R. Day. J. Sup. Ct. Hist., 40, xxxviii.
- Black, C. L. (1997). A New Birth of Freedom: Human Rights, Named and Unnamed. Yale University Press.
- Browne, W. H., Hall, C. C., & Steiner, B. C. (1888). Archives of Maryland 6. Maryland Historical Society.
- Bush, G.W. (2002, March 29). No Moderate Judges, NEWSDAY, at A16, available at 2002 WL2735564.
- Chit wood, O. P. (1905). Justice in colonial Virginia (No. 7-8). Johns Hopkins Press.
- Ely, J. H. (1980). Democracy and distrust: A theory of judicial review. Harvard University Press.
- Field, R. S. (1849). The Provincial Courts of New Jersey: With Sketches of the Bench and Bar: a Discourse Read Before the New Jersey Historical Society 3. Society.
- Ford, W. C., Hunt, G., Fitzpatrick, J. C., Hill, R. R., Harris, K. E., & Tilley, S. D. (1914). Journals of the Continental Congress (Vol. 22). US Government Printing Office.
- Grants, C. (1904). Original Constitutions of the Province of New Jersey.
- Greenberg, K. S. (1977). Representation and the isolation of South Carolina, 1776-1860. The Journal of American History, 64(3), 723-743.
- Grice, W. (1931). The Georgia Bench and Bar (Vol. 1). JW Burke Company.
- Israel, J. H. (1963). Gideon v. Wainwright: The" Art" of Overruling. The Supreme Court Review, 1963, 211-272.
- Lunt, D. C. (1963). Tales of the Delaware bench and bar. University of Delaware Press.
- Olson, J. S., & Shadle, R. (1996). Historical dictionary of the British empire. Greenwood Publishing Group.
- Osgood, H. L. (1904). The American Colonies in the Seventeenth Century: The chartered c
- Roe, G. E. (1912). Our Judicial Oligarchy. BW Huebsch.
- Smith, C. E., & Johnson, S. P. (1991). Newcomer on the High Court: Justice David Souter and the Supreme Court's 1990 Term. SDL Rev., 37, 21.
- Smith, W. (1796). A Comparative View of the constitutions of the several states with each other, and with that of the United States; exhibiting in tables the prominent features of each constitution,... with notes and observations.
- Strauss, P. L. (2001). Courts or Tribunals--Federal Courts and the Common Law. Ala. L. Rev., 53, 891.
- Walker, D. B. (1995). The rebirth of federalism: Slouching toward Washington. Chatham House Publishers.
- Warren, C. (2011). The Supreme Court in United States History (Vol. 1). Cosmo, Inc.
- Washburn, G. A. (1923). Imperial control of the administration of justice in the thirteen American colonies, 1684-1776 (Vol. 105, No. 2). New York: Columbia University.
Cite this article
-
APA : Raza, A., Gul, N., & Shah, A. A. (2022). Judicial Activism , Constitutional Challenges in the United States. Global Legal Studies Review, VII(II), 59-65. https://doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2022(VII-II).07
-
CHICAGO : Raza, Ahmad, Noman Gul, and Azmat Ali Shah. 2022. "Judicial Activism , Constitutional Challenges in the United States." Global Legal Studies Review, VII (II): 59-65 doi: 10.31703/glsr.2022(VII-II).07
-
HARVARD : RAZA, A., GUL, N. & SHAH, A. A. 2022. Judicial Activism , Constitutional Challenges in the United States. Global Legal Studies Review, VII, 59-65.
-
MHRA : Raza, Ahmad, Noman Gul, and Azmat Ali Shah. 2022. "Judicial Activism , Constitutional Challenges in the United States." Global Legal Studies Review, VII: 59-65
-
MLA : Raza, Ahmad, Noman Gul, and Azmat Ali Shah. "Judicial Activism , Constitutional Challenges in the United States." Global Legal Studies Review, VII.II (2022): 59-65 Print.
-
OXFORD : Raza, Ahmad, Gul, Noman, and Shah, Azmat Ali (2022), "Judicial Activism , Constitutional Challenges in the United States", Global Legal Studies Review, VII (II), 59-65
-
TURABIAN : Raza, Ahmad, Noman Gul, and Azmat Ali Shah. "Judicial Activism , Constitutional Challenges in the United States." Global Legal Studies Review VII, no. II (2022): 59-65. https://doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2022(VII-II).07