http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2020(V-III).15
10.31703/glsr.2020(V-III).15
Published : Sep 2020
Role of UN on J and K under International Law: A Paradigm Shift from Active Mediation to Passive Engagement
The purpose of this paper is to critically analyze the role of the UN on the conflict of J and K. The Kashmir Issue has been on the agenda of the UN since 1948. There are many stages of the UN's intervention for the resolution of this protracted conflict. There is a need to critically analyze the role of the UN in the conflict of J and K. This research paper will analyze the role of the UN in a critical manner to explore the causes and circumstances responsible for the failure of the UN in resolving this conflict. The findings of this paper will be based upon the literature review on the conflict of J and K and UN's mediation. This study can be very useful in the future to analyze the role of the UN in resolving international disputes and to evaluate the causes of the failure of the UN in different protracted conflicts.
-
UN, Conflict of J and K, Mediation, Resolutions on J and K, Paradigm Shift, and Passive Engagement
-
(1) Adnan Rahman
Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Law, Faculty of Sharia and Law, IIUI/ Faculty Member of Law, Department of Law, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarab
(2) Ataullah Khan Mahmood
Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Sharia and Law, International Islamic University Islamabad (IIUI), Pakistan.
(3) Saqib Shahbaz
Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mirpur University of Science and Technology (MUST), Mirpur, AJK, Pakistan.
- Ahmad, I, & Bashir, A. (2004). India and Pakistan: Charting a Path to Peace, The Society for Tolerance and Education, Pakistan, 49.
- Akbar, M. J. (2016). Kashmir behind the Vale. Roli Books
- Bursac, S. (2010). The Right of Peoples to Self-Determination. Medjunarodni Problemi 62 (2), 276- 313.
- Cheema, P. I. (1980). Conflict and Cooperation in the Indian Ocean : Pakistan's Interests and Choices. Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.
- Cheema, P. I. (2014). The Kashmir Dispute: Key to South Asian Peace. IPRI Journal XIV, (1), 1 - 20.
- Cheema, P.I. (2016). Resolving Kashmir Dispute Analyzing Various Approaches. Margalla Papers20 (1), 23-36.
- Cheryl, S. (2014). Constitutional Review in Conciliation Resources, Legitimacy and Peace Processes. Accord, 25.
- Dewan, P. (2003). Jammu, Kashmir, Laddakh, Men's Publications.
- Fai, G. N. (2012). Resolution of the Kashmir Dispute. Strategic Studies, 32 (Winter 2012), 2-3.
- Ganguly, R. (1998). India, Pakistan and the Kashmir Dispute. Assembly, 1-12.
- Ganguly, S. (2016). Deadly Impasse. Cambridge University Press..
- Hart, V. (2001). Constitution-Making and Transformation of a Conflict. PEACE & CHANGE, 26 (2), 153 - 176.
- Hilali, A. (1997). Kashmir dispute and UN mediation efforts: An historical perspective. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 8(2), 61-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592319708423174.
- Hussain, I. (2000). Kashmir and International Law Perspective. National Institute of Pakistan Studies
- Korbel, J. (1954)). Danger in Kashmir. Princeton University Press.
- Lamb, A. (1991). Kashmir a Disputed Legacy 1846 - 1990. Oxford Printing Press.
- Noorani, A.G. (2011). Article 370: A Constitutional History of Jammu and Kashmir. Oxford University Press.
- Qadeer, M. A. (2018). United Nations Resolutions on Kashmir and Their Relevance. Journal of Strategic Affairs, 2 (2), 81
- Rahman, A., & Munir, S. (2020). Demographic Changes in Indian Administered Jammu and Kashmir: A Legal Perspective. Journal of Pakistan Vision, 21 (2), 75 - 86.
- Razdan, O. (1999). The Trauma of Kashmir: The Untold Reality. Oxford University Publishers.
- Saraf, M, Y. (1979). Kashmiris Fight for Freedom. Feroz Sons Ltd.
- Schofield, V. (1997). Kashmir in the Crossfire. London: IB Tauris& Co.
- The India-Pakistan Simla agreement, 3 July 1972. (1972). Survival, 14(5), 242. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396337208441358.
- United Nations Commission on India and Pakistan was established by Security Council Resolution, No. 39, dated 20th of January, 1948, comprising three members, one was nominated by Pakistan, another by India and third was designated by both the nominated members.
Cite this article
-
APA : Rahman, A., Mahmood, A. K., & Shahbaz, S. (2020). Role of UN on J and K under International Law: A Paradigm Shift from Active Mediation to Passive Engagement. Global Legal Studies Review, V(III), 120-127. https://doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2020(V-III).15
-
CHICAGO : Rahman, Adnan, Ataullah Khan Mahmood, and Saqib Shahbaz. 2020. "Role of UN on J and K under International Law: A Paradigm Shift from Active Mediation to Passive Engagement." Global Legal Studies Review, V (III): 120-127 doi: 10.31703/glsr.2020(V-III).15
-
HARVARD : RAHMAN, A., MAHMOOD, A. K. & SHAHBAZ, S. 2020. Role of UN on J and K under International Law: A Paradigm Shift from Active Mediation to Passive Engagement. Global Legal Studies Review, V, 120-127.
-
MHRA : Rahman, Adnan, Ataullah Khan Mahmood, and Saqib Shahbaz. 2020. "Role of UN on J and K under International Law: A Paradigm Shift from Active Mediation to Passive Engagement." Global Legal Studies Review, V: 120-127
-
MLA : Rahman, Adnan, Ataullah Khan Mahmood, and Saqib Shahbaz. "Role of UN on J and K under International Law: A Paradigm Shift from Active Mediation to Passive Engagement." Global Legal Studies Review, V.III (2020): 120-127 Print.
-
OXFORD : Rahman, Adnan, Mahmood, Ataullah Khan, and Shahbaz, Saqib (2020), "Role of UN on J and K under International Law: A Paradigm Shift from Active Mediation to Passive Engagement", Global Legal Studies Review, V (III), 120-127
-
TURABIAN : Rahman, Adnan, Ataullah Khan Mahmood, and Saqib Shahbaz. "Role of UN on J and K under International Law: A Paradigm Shift from Active Mediation to Passive Engagement." Global Legal Studies Review V, no. III (2020): 120-127. https://doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2020(V-III).15