The Principles of Sentence Reduction: Escaping Punishment or Administration of Justice?
Law has impacts on victims and criminals. It is important to analyze its effects and consequences. The research focuses on the principles of sentence reduction in the white-collar crime of cheating public at large collected and organized through study of appeal cases. Often, the convicted appeals for a reduction in sentence.This research aims to highlight those grounds which make the grant or refusal of appeals legally justified, formulate the principles of reduction and analyze their positive and negative effects on the victims and the offenders. It is upon the individual how, according to the circumstance before sight, he implements the derived principles and reaches his individually special conclusion. This research is basically a confined document related to the principle of granting and refusing the reduction in the sentence of criminals for cheating the public at large.
-
White Collar Crime, Principle of Sentence Reduction, Cheating Public at large
-
(1) Muhammad Tahir
Professor, School of Law, University of Karachi , Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
(2) Aeman Khan
Lecturer, Dadabhoy Institute of Higher Education, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
(3) Zainab Effendi Haqqi
Assistant Professor., Dadabhoy Institute of Higher Education, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
- Correia, M. E. (2015). Intermittent White-Collar Offenders: Who They Are and How to Stop Them. Intermittent White-Collar Offenders: Who They Are and How to Stop Them. https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=honorscollege_cj
- Harry R. Dammer, J. S. (n.d.). Comparative Criminal Justice System.
- Luedtke, D. (2014). Progression in the Age of Recession: Restorative Justice and White-Collar Crime in Post-Recession America. Progression in the Age of Recession; Restorative Justice and White Collar Crime in Post Recession, 9(1), 14. https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjcfcl/vol9 /iss1/14/
- Bashir, S. (2011). Antecedents of white collar crime in organizations: A literature review. African Journal of Business Management, 5(35). https://doi.org/10.5897/ajbmx11.008
- Shapiro, S. P. (December 1980). Thinking About White Collar Crime- Matters of Conceptualization and Research. National Institute of Justice.
- ZAHID, H. E. (Dec 2017). Sentencing Theory and Practice; A Comparison of Pakistani Legislation and Case Law With Practice.
- Austin-Campbell, S. (2020). White-Collar Crime. Does punishment deter fraudulent criminal activity? Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3732295
- Haugh, T. (2014). Sentencing the Why of White Collar Crime. Sentencing the Why of White Collar Crime., 82(6), 3143. http://fordhamlawreview.org/assets/pdfs/Vol_82/No_6/Haugh_May.pdf
- Hewitt, J. (2016). Fifty Shades of Gray: Sentencing Trends in Major White-Collar Cases. Fifty Shades of Gray: Sentencing Trends in Major White- Collar Cases, 125(4), 4. https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5743&context=ylj
- Bennett, M. W., Levinson, J. D., & Hioki, K. (2016). Judging Federal White-Collar Fraud Sentencing: An empirical study revealing the need for further reform. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2735864
- Morgan, J. P. (2010). The "Green" Effect on White Collar Sentencing: An Analysis of the Impact of the Economy on Imprisonment Lengths of Sentences. Mercer Law Review, 61, 4.
- Nyazee, I. a. K. (2003). Islamic jurisprudence: U Å«l Al- Fiqh.
- Fellmeth, A. X., & Horwitz, M. (2021). Guide to Latin in International Law. Oxford University Press.
- Abdul Hameed Vs NAB, PCR 1380 (2018).
- Allah Raka v. The State, SCMR 1063 (2020).
- Bakht Munir vs. The State, SCMR 588 (2020).
- Manzoor Ahmad Akhtar Vs The State, MLD 233 (2020).
- Mukhtar Alam v. Fazal Nawab, SCMR 618 (2020).
- Najam Us Saqib Vs NAB (776 PCR LJ 2021).
- Rashid Minhas Vs NAB, YLR 1072 (Accountability Court, Islamabad 2021).
Cite this article
-
APA : Tahir, M., Khan, A., & Haqqi, Z. E. (2023). The Principles of Sentence Reduction: Escaping Punishment or Administration of Justice?. Global Legal Studies Review, VIII(III), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2023(VIII-III).05
-
CHICAGO : Tahir, Muhammad, Aeman Khan, and Zainab Effendi Haqqi. 2023. "The Principles of Sentence Reduction: Escaping Punishment or Administration of Justice?." Global Legal Studies Review, VIII (III): 37-44 doi: 10.31703/glsr.2023(VIII-III).05
-
HARVARD : TAHIR, M., KHAN, A. & HAQQI, Z. E. 2023. The Principles of Sentence Reduction: Escaping Punishment or Administration of Justice?. Global Legal Studies Review, VIII, 37-44.
-
MHRA : Tahir, Muhammad, Aeman Khan, and Zainab Effendi Haqqi. 2023. "The Principles of Sentence Reduction: Escaping Punishment or Administration of Justice?." Global Legal Studies Review, VIII: 37-44
-
MLA : Tahir, Muhammad, Aeman Khan, and Zainab Effendi Haqqi. "The Principles of Sentence Reduction: Escaping Punishment or Administration of Justice?." Global Legal Studies Review, VIII.III (2023): 37-44 Print.
-
OXFORD : Tahir, Muhammad, Khan, Aeman, and Haqqi, Zainab Effendi (2023), "The Principles of Sentence Reduction: Escaping Punishment or Administration of Justice?", Global Legal Studies Review, VIII (III), 37-44
-
TURABIAN : Tahir, Muhammad, Aeman Khan, and Zainab Effendi Haqqi. "The Principles of Sentence Reduction: Escaping Punishment or Administration of Justice?." Global Legal Studies Review VIII, no. III (2023): 37-44. https://doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2023(VIII-III).05