ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION CONCEPT CRITICISM AND FUTURE OF ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2023(VIII-II).05      10.31703/glsr.2023(VIII-II).05      Published : Jun 2023
Authored by : Naureen Akhtar , Saadat Ali Nadeem , Rao ImranHabib

05 Pages : 36-42

References

  • Klug, H., Dezalay, Y., & Garth, B. G. (1998). Dealing in virtue: international commercial arbitration and the construction of a transnational legal order. Contemporary Sociology, 27(2), 196. https://doi.org/10.2307/2654815
  • Steffek, F. (2011). Mediation in The Max Planck Encyclopedia of European Private Law (J. Basedow, K.J. Hopt, R. Zimmermann, A. Stier, eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Felstiner, W. L. F., Abel, R. L., & Sarat, A. (1980). The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . . Law & Society Review, 15(3/4), 631. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053505
  • Fuller, L. (1963). Collective bargaining and the arbitrator. Wisconsin Law Review, 18, 3–47. https://naarb.org/proceedings/pdfs/1962-8.pdf
  • Fuller, L. L. (2018). Mediation—its Forms and Functions. In Southern California Law Review. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315204826-1
  • Fuller, L. L., & Winston, K. (1978). The forms and limits of adjudication. Harvard Law Review, 92(2), 353. https://doi.org/10.2307/1340368
  • Genn, H. (1998). The Central London County Court Pilot Mediation Scheme: Evaluation Report. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/33400/
  • Greenberg, M. A., Barton, J., & Mcguinness, M. M. (2000). Words over war : mediation and arbitration to prevent deadly conflict. In Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA47522681
  • Grillo, T. (1991). The Mediation Alternative: Process Dangers for Women. Yale Law Journal, 100(6), 1545-1610. https://doi.org/10.2307/796781
  • H. Kritzer (2018). Let's Make A Deal: Understanding the Negotiation Process in Ordinary Litigation. Madison, WI: Choice Reviews Online, 29(08), 29– 4738. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.29-4738
  • Silverman, R. H., & Auerbach, J. S. (1984). Justice without Law? Resolving Disputes without Lawyers. The American Historical Review, 89(2), 533. https://doi.org/10.2307/1862730
  • Katsh, E., Katsh, M. E., & Rifkin, J. (2001). Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflicts in Cyberspace. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA53132965
  • Luban, D. (2020). Settlements and the erosion of the public realm. Georgetown Law Journal, 83, 2619–2662.
  • Shapiro, M. (n.d.). Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. In University of Chicago Press. University of Chicago Press. Retrieved July 15, 2023, from https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo5967169.html
  • M., Palmer, & Roberts, S. (1998). Dispute Processes: ADR and the Primary Forms of Decision Making. London: Butterworth
  • MacCoun, R. J., E. Allan Lind, & Tyler, T. R. (1992). Alternative Dispute Resolution in Trial and Appellate Courts. 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4038-7_6
  • Menkel-Meadow, C. (1984). Toward another view of legal negotiation: The structure of problem solving. UCLA Law Review, 31, 754–842.
  • Menkel-Meadow, C. (1995a). The many ways of mediation: The transformation of traditions, ideologies, paradigms and practices. Negotiation Journal, 11(3), 217–242
  • Menkel-Meadow, C. (1995b). Whose dispute is it anyway? A philosophical and democratic defense of settlement (in some cases). Georgetown Law Journal, 83, 2663–2696.
  • Menkel-Meadow, C. (1997). When dispute resolution begets disputes of its own: Conflicts among dispute professionals. UCLA Law Review, 44, 1871–1933.
  • Menkel-Meadow, C. (2010). Dispute Resolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542475.013.0026
  • Menkel-Meadow, C. (2011). Scaling Up Deliberative Democracy as Dispute Resolution in Health Care Reform: A work in progress, Law & Contemporary Problems 74(3): 1-30. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315248592-18
  • Menkel-Meadow, C. (2012). Complex Dispute Resolution: Volume III: Introduction and Coda: International Dispute Resolution. Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works. https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1188
  • Merry, S., & Milner, N. (1993). The Possibility of Popular Justice: A Case Study of American Community Justice. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Fiss, O. (2018). Against settlement. Yale Law Journal, 93, 1073–1090. https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/faculty/papers/againstsettlement.pdf
  • Abel, R. (1982). The contradictions of informal justice. In R. Abel (Ed.), The Politics of Informal Justice: The American Experience. New York: Academic Press.
  • Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (2009). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. (2nd edn.). New York: Viking Penguin
  • Delgado, R., et al. (2017). Fairness and formality: Minimizing the risk of prejudice in alternative dispute resolution. Wisconsin Law Review, 1985, 1359–1404.
  • Lubman, S. (1967). Mao and mediation: Politics and dispute resolution in communist China. California Law Review, 55, 1284–1359.
  • Salacuse, J. (1998). Ten ways that culture affects negotiating style: Some survey results. Negotiation Journal, 14(3), 221–240.
  • Sander, F., & Goldberg, S. (2020). Fitting the forum to the fuss: A user friendly guide to selecting an ADR procedure. Negotiation Journal, 10, 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.1994.tb00005.x
  • Burger, W. (2018). Agenda for 2000 AD—need for systematic anticipation. Federal Rules Decisions, 70, 92–94.
  • Woolf Lord. (1996). Access to Justice: Final Report to the Lord Chancellor on the Civil Justice System. London: HMSO.
  • Klug, H., Dezalay, Y., & Garth, B. G. (1998). Dealing in virtue: international commercial arbitration and the construction of a transnational legal order. Contemporary Sociology, 27(2), 196. https://doi.org/10.2307/2654815
  • Steffek, F. (2011). Mediation in The Max Planck Encyclopedia of European Private Law (J. Basedow, K.J. Hopt, R. Zimmermann, A. Stier, eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Felstiner, W. L. F., Abel, R. L., & Sarat, A. (1980). The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . . Law & Society Review, 15(3/4), 631. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053505
  • Fuller, L. (1963). Collective bargaining and the arbitrator. Wisconsin Law Review, 18, 3–47. https://naarb.org/proceedings/pdfs/1962-8.pdf
  • Fuller, L. L. (2018). Mediation—its Forms and Functions. In Southern California Law Review. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315204826-1
  • Fuller, L. L., & Winston, K. (1978). The forms and limits of adjudication. Harvard Law Review, 92(2), 353. https://doi.org/10.2307/1340368
  • Genn, H. (1998). The Central London County Court Pilot Mediation Scheme: Evaluation Report. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/33400/
  • Greenberg, M. A., Barton, J., & Mcguinness, M. M. (2000). Words over war : mediation and arbitration to prevent deadly conflict. In Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA47522681
  • Grillo, T. (1991). The Mediation Alternative: Process Dangers for Women. Yale Law Journal, 100(6), 1545-1610. https://doi.org/10.2307/796781
  • H. Kritzer (2018). Let's Make A Deal: Understanding the Negotiation Process in Ordinary Litigation. Madison, WI: Choice Reviews Online, 29(08), 29– 4738. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.29-4738
  • Silverman, R. H., & Auerbach, J. S. (1984). Justice without Law? Resolving Disputes without Lawyers. The American Historical Review, 89(2), 533. https://doi.org/10.2307/1862730
  • Katsh, E., Katsh, M. E., & Rifkin, J. (2001). Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflicts in Cyberspace. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA53132965
  • Luban, D. (2020). Settlements and the erosion of the public realm. Georgetown Law Journal, 83, 2619–2662.
  • Shapiro, M. (n.d.). Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. In University of Chicago Press. University of Chicago Press. Retrieved July 15, 2023, from https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo5967169.html
  • M., Palmer, & Roberts, S. (1998). Dispute Processes: ADR and the Primary Forms of Decision Making. London: Butterworth
  • MacCoun, R. J., E. Allan Lind, & Tyler, T. R. (1992). Alternative Dispute Resolution in Trial and Appellate Courts. 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4038-7_6
  • Menkel-Meadow, C. (1984). Toward another view of legal negotiation: The structure of problem solving. UCLA Law Review, 31, 754–842.
  • Menkel-Meadow, C. (1995a). The many ways of mediation: The transformation of traditions, ideologies, paradigms and practices. Negotiation Journal, 11(3), 217–242
  • Menkel-Meadow, C. (1995b). Whose dispute is it anyway? A philosophical and democratic defense of settlement (in some cases). Georgetown Law Journal, 83, 2663–2696.
  • Menkel-Meadow, C. (1997). When dispute resolution begets disputes of its own: Conflicts among dispute professionals. UCLA Law Review, 44, 1871–1933.
  • Menkel-Meadow, C. (2010). Dispute Resolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542475.013.0026
  • Menkel-Meadow, C. (2011). Scaling Up Deliberative Democracy as Dispute Resolution in Health Care Reform: A work in progress, Law & Contemporary Problems 74(3): 1-30. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315248592-18
  • Menkel-Meadow, C. (2012). Complex Dispute Resolution: Volume III: Introduction and Coda: International Dispute Resolution. Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works. https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1188
  • Merry, S., & Milner, N. (1993). The Possibility of Popular Justice: A Case Study of American Community Justice. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Fiss, O. (2018). Against settlement. Yale Law Journal, 93, 1073–1090. https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/faculty/papers/againstsettlement.pdf
  • Abel, R. (1982). The contradictions of informal justice. In R. Abel (Ed.), The Politics of Informal Justice: The American Experience. New York: Academic Press.
  • Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (2009). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. (2nd edn.). New York: Viking Penguin
  • Delgado, R., et al. (2017). Fairness and formality: Minimizing the risk of prejudice in alternative dispute resolution. Wisconsin Law Review, 1985, 1359–1404.
  • Lubman, S. (1967). Mao and mediation: Politics and dispute resolution in communist China. California Law Review, 55, 1284–1359.
  • Salacuse, J. (1998). Ten ways that culture affects negotiating style: Some survey results. Negotiation Journal, 14(3), 221–240.
  • Sander, F., & Goldberg, S. (2020). Fitting the forum to the fuss: A user friendly guide to selecting an ADR procedure. Negotiation Journal, 10, 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.1994.tb00005.x
  • Burger, W. (2018). Agenda for 2000 AD—need for systematic anticipation. Federal Rules Decisions, 70, 92–94.
  • Woolf Lord. (1996). Access to Justice: Final Report to the Lord Chancellor on the Civil Justice System. London: HMSO.

Cite this article

    APA : Akhtar, N., Nadeem, S. A., & Habib, R. I. (2023). Alternative Dispute Resolution: Concept, Criticism and Future of Arbitration and Mediation. Global Legal Studies Review, VIII(II), 36-42. https://doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2023(VIII-II).05
    CHICAGO : Akhtar, Naureen, Saadat Ali Nadeem, and Rao Imran Habib. 2023. "Alternative Dispute Resolution: Concept, Criticism and Future of Arbitration and Mediation." Global Legal Studies Review, VIII (II): 36-42 doi: 10.31703/glsr.2023(VIII-II).05
    HARVARD : AKHTAR, N., NADEEM, S. A. & HABIB, R. I. 2023. Alternative Dispute Resolution: Concept, Criticism and Future of Arbitration and Mediation. Global Legal Studies Review, VIII, 36-42.
    MHRA : Akhtar, Naureen, Saadat Ali Nadeem, and Rao Imran Habib. 2023. "Alternative Dispute Resolution: Concept, Criticism and Future of Arbitration and Mediation." Global Legal Studies Review, VIII: 36-42
    MLA : Akhtar, Naureen, Saadat Ali Nadeem, and Rao Imran Habib. "Alternative Dispute Resolution: Concept, Criticism and Future of Arbitration and Mediation." Global Legal Studies Review, VIII.II (2023): 36-42 Print.
    OXFORD : Akhtar, Naureen, Nadeem, Saadat Ali, and Habib, Rao Imran (2023), "Alternative Dispute Resolution: Concept, Criticism and Future of Arbitration and Mediation", Global Legal Studies Review, VIII (II), 36-42
    TURABIAN : Akhtar, Naureen, Saadat Ali Nadeem, and Rao Imran Habib. "Alternative Dispute Resolution: Concept, Criticism and Future of Arbitration and Mediation." Global Legal Studies Review VIII, no. II (2023): 36-42. https://doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2023(VIII-II).05