AN APPRAISAL OF CASES UNDER SECTION 9C OF THE CONTROL OF NARCOTIC SUBSTANCE ACT 1997 AND THE ROLE OF FORENSIC EVIDENCE

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2022(VII-II).02      10.31703/glsr.2022(VII-II).02      Published : Jun 2022
Authored by : Atika Lohani , Aamir Abbas

02 Pages : 16-25

References

  • Anti-narcotics Force (Adaptation and Enforcement) Order 2000 Anti-Narcotics Force Act 1997(III of 1997)
  • Anti-narcotics Force Ordinance 1996
  • Anti-Narcotics Task Force Ordinance 1994 (LXXVI of 1994)
  • Anti-narcotics Task Force Ordinance 1991
  • Anti-Narcotics Force Reward Rules 2000
  • Control of Narcotic Substances Act 1997 (XXV of 1997)
  • Control of Narcotic Substances (Government Analysts) Rules 2001
  • Disposal of Vehicles and Other Articles (Involved In The Narcotics Cases) Rules 2013
  • Narcotics Testing Laboratories for The Purpose of the Act August 7 1997
  • Police Act, 1861(V of 1861)
  • Freer, E. (2020). Experts and pretenders: Examining possible responses to misconduct by experts in criminal trials in England and Wales. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 24(2), 180–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712720913336
  • Gross, S. R., & Mnookin, J. L. (2003b). Expert Information and Expert Evidence: A Preliminary Taxonomy. SSRN Electronic Journal, 8(2), 141– 189. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.477202
  • Kovera, M.B., Austin, J.L., (2015) Expert Testimony, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 8(2), 582–587.
  • National Justice Campania Naviera, S.A.vs. Prudential Assurance Co. Ltd (1993) 2 Lloyds Rep 68
  • Naseem Khan vs. State 2021 SCMR 1771
  • Aijaz Ali Rajpar vs. State 2021 SCMR 1773
  • Haroon-ur-Rasheed vs State 2021 SCMR 1106
  • Bilal Khan Vs, State 2021 SCMR 460
  • State vs. Aurangzeb 2021 SCMR 1552
  • Ibrar Ullah vs. State 2021 SCMR 128
  • Mushtaq Ahmad vs. State 2020 SCMR 474
  • Shazia Bibi vs. State 2020 SCMR 460
  • Izzat Ullah vs. State 2019 SCMR 1975
  • Mst. Razia Sultana vs. State 2019 SCMR 1300
  • Muhammad Adnan vs. State 2018 PLD 823
  • Muhammad Sarfraz vs. State 2017 SCMR 1874
  • Zubair Khan vs. State 2021 SCMR 492
  • Mst. Sakina Ramazan vs. State 2021 SCMR 451
  • Gulzar vs. State 2021 SCMR 380
  • Qaiser Khan vs. State 2021 SCMR 363
  • Faheem Ullah vs. State 2021 SCMR 1795
  • Haji Nawaz vs. State 2020 SCMR 687
  • Hussain Shah vs. State 2020 PLD 132
  • Faizan Ali vs. State 2019 SCMR 1649
  • Mst. Razia Sultana vs. State 2019 SCMR 1300
  • Kamran Shah vs. State 2019 SCMR 1217
  • Abdul Ghani vs. State 2019 SCMR 608
  • Muhammad Naeem vs. State 2019 SCMR 608
  • The state ANF vs. Muhammad Arshad 2017 SCMR 283
  • Muhammad Akhtar vs. State 2017 SCMR 161
  • Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (1993) 509 U.S. 579
  • National Justice Campania Naviera, S.A.vs. Prudential Assurance Co. Ltd (1993) 2 Lloyds Rep 68
  • Anti-narcotics Force (Adaptation and Enforcement) Order 2000 Anti-Narcotics Force Act 1997(III of 1997)
  • Anti-narcotics Force Ordinance 1996
  • Anti-Narcotics Task Force Ordinance 1994 (LXXVI of 1994)
  • Anti-narcotics Task Force Ordinance 1991
  • Anti-Narcotics Force Reward Rules 2000
  • Control of Narcotic Substances Act 1997 (XXV of 1997)
  • Control of Narcotic Substances (Government Analysts) Rules 2001
  • Disposal of Vehicles and Other Articles (Involved In The Narcotics Cases) Rules 2013
  • Narcotics Testing Laboratories for The Purpose of the Act August 7 1997
  • Police Act, 1861(V of 1861)
  • Freer, E. (2020). Experts and pretenders: Examining possible responses to misconduct by experts in criminal trials in England and Wales. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 24(2), 180–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712720913336
  • Gross, S. R., & Mnookin, J. L. (2003b). Expert Information and Expert Evidence: A Preliminary Taxonomy. SSRN Electronic Journal, 8(2), 141– 189. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.477202
  • Kovera, M.B., Austin, J.L., (2015) Expert Testimony, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 8(2), 582–587.
  • National Justice Campania Naviera, S.A.vs. Prudential Assurance Co. Ltd (1993) 2 Lloyds Rep 68
  • Naseem Khan vs. State 2021 SCMR 1771
  • Aijaz Ali Rajpar vs. State 2021 SCMR 1773
  • Haroon-ur-Rasheed vs State 2021 SCMR 1106
  • Bilal Khan Vs, State 2021 SCMR 460
  • State vs. Aurangzeb 2021 SCMR 1552
  • Ibrar Ullah vs. State 2021 SCMR 128
  • Mushtaq Ahmad vs. State 2020 SCMR 474
  • Shazia Bibi vs. State 2020 SCMR 460
  • Izzat Ullah vs. State 2019 SCMR 1975
  • Mst. Razia Sultana vs. State 2019 SCMR 1300
  • Muhammad Adnan vs. State 2018 PLD 823
  • Muhammad Sarfraz vs. State 2017 SCMR 1874
  • Zubair Khan vs. State 2021 SCMR 492
  • Mst. Sakina Ramazan vs. State 2021 SCMR 451
  • Gulzar vs. State 2021 SCMR 380
  • Qaiser Khan vs. State 2021 SCMR 363
  • Faheem Ullah vs. State 2021 SCMR 1795
  • Haji Nawaz vs. State 2020 SCMR 687
  • Hussain Shah vs. State 2020 PLD 132
  • Faizan Ali vs. State 2019 SCMR 1649
  • Mst. Razia Sultana vs. State 2019 SCMR 1300
  • Kamran Shah vs. State 2019 SCMR 1217
  • Abdul Ghani vs. State 2019 SCMR 608
  • Muhammad Naeem vs. State 2019 SCMR 608
  • The state ANF vs. Muhammad Arshad 2017 SCMR 283
  • Muhammad Akhtar vs. State 2017 SCMR 161
  • Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (1993) 509 U.S. 579
  • National Justice Campania Naviera, S.A.vs. Prudential Assurance Co. Ltd (1993) 2 Lloyds Rep 68

Cite this article

    APA : Lohani, A., & Abbas, A. (2022). An Appraisal of Cases under Section 9(c) of The Control of Narcotic Substance Act 1997 and the role of Forensic Evidence. Global Legal Studies Review, VII(II), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2022(VII-II).02
    CHICAGO : Lohani, Atika, and Aamir Abbas. 2022. "An Appraisal of Cases under Section 9(c) of The Control of Narcotic Substance Act 1997 and the role of Forensic Evidence." Global Legal Studies Review, VII (II): 16-25 doi: 10.31703/glsr.2022(VII-II).02
    HARVARD : LOHANI, A. & ABBAS, A. 2022. An Appraisal of Cases under Section 9(c) of The Control of Narcotic Substance Act 1997 and the role of Forensic Evidence. Global Legal Studies Review, VII, 16-25.
    MHRA : Lohani, Atika, and Aamir Abbas. 2022. "An Appraisal of Cases under Section 9(c) of The Control of Narcotic Substance Act 1997 and the role of Forensic Evidence." Global Legal Studies Review, VII: 16-25
    MLA : Lohani, Atika, and Aamir Abbas. "An Appraisal of Cases under Section 9(c) of The Control of Narcotic Substance Act 1997 and the role of Forensic Evidence." Global Legal Studies Review, VII.II (2022): 16-25 Print.
    OXFORD : Lohani, Atika and Abbas, Aamir (2022), "An Appraisal of Cases under Section 9(c) of The Control of Narcotic Substance Act 1997 and the role of Forensic Evidence", Global Legal Studies Review, VII (II), 16-25
    TURABIAN : Lohani, Atika, and Aamir Abbas. "An Appraisal of Cases under Section 9(c) of The Control of Narcotic Substance Act 1997 and the role of Forensic Evidence." Global Legal Studies Review VII, no. II (2022): 16-25. https://doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2022(VII-II).02