AN INTRODUCTION TO THE PSYCHOLOGY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2023(VIII-I).06      10.31703/glsr.2023(VIII-I).06      Published : Mar 2023
Authored by : Saadat Ali Nadeem , Samana Mehmood , Malik Zia-ud-Din

06 Pages : 54-61

References

  • ALLEN, D. W. (2014). The Coase theorem: coherent, logical, and not disproved. Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(2), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744137414000083
  • Andreis, F. de. (2020). A Theoretical Approach to the Effective Decision-Making Process. Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(06), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2020.106022
  • Bellamy, R., & Weale, A. (2015). Political legitimacy and European monetary union: contracts, constitutionalism and the normative logic of two-level games. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.995118
  • Blumenthal-Barby, J. S., & Krieger, H. (2014). Cognitive Biases and Heuristics in Medical Decision Making. Medical Decision Making, 35(4), 539–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x14547740
  • Broude, T. (2015). BEHAVIORAL INTERNATIONAL LAW. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 163(4), 1099–1157. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24752762
  • Conrad, C. R., & Ritter, E. H. (2013). Treaties, Tenure, and Torture: The Conflicting Domestic Effects of International Law. The Journal of Politics, 75(2), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381613000091
  • Delcourt, B. (2016). Political Economy of International Law: A Convenient Alliance for the Study of Compliance? In The Political Economy of International Law (pp. 159-177). Edward Elgar Publishing
  • Dhami, S., & al-Nowaihi, A. (2007). Why do people pay taxes? Prospect theory versus expected utility theory. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 64(1), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.08.006
  • Gaudet, S., Marchand, I., Bujaki, M., & Bourgeault, I. L. (2021). Women and gender equity in academia through the conceptual lens of care. Journal of Gender Studies, Journal of Gender Studies(1), 1– 13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2021.1944848
  • Hafner-Burton, E. M., LeVeck, B. L., & Victor, D. G. (2016). How Activists Perceive the Utility of International Law. The Journal of Politics, 78(1), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1086/683371
  • Heavey, C., Simsek, Z., Roche, F., & Kelly, A. (2009). Decision Comprehensiveness and Corporate Entrepreneurship: The Moderating Role of Managerial Uncertainty Preferences and Environmental Dynamism. Journal of Management Studies, 46(8), 1289–1314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00858.x
  • Hirsch, M. (2019). Cognitive Sociology, Social Cognition and Coping with Racial Discrimination in International Law. European Journal of International Law, 30(4), 1319–1338. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chaa003
  • Iberahim, M. M., & Tantikulanan, C. (2020). Indonesia’s Two-level Game at the WTO: A Political Economy Approach to the International Poultry Trade. Multi-dimensional Disruption in the Asia-Pacific.
  • Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., Fünfschilling, L., Hess, D., Holtz, G., Hyysalo, S., Jenkins, K., Kivimaa, P., Martiskainen, M., McMeekin, A., Mühlemeier, M. S., & Nykvist, B. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
  • Krook, M. L., & True, J. (2010). Rethinking the life cycles of international norms: The United Nations and the global promotion of gender equality. European Journal of International Relations, 18(1), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066110380963
  • Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45(2), 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0
  • Levitt, B. B., Lai, H. C., & Manville, A. M. (2021). Effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on flora and fauna, Part 3. Exposure standards, public policy, laws, and future directions. Reviews on Environmental Health, 37(4), 531–558. https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2021-0083
  • Liedtka, J. (2018). Why design thinking works. Harvard Business Review, 96(5), 72-79.
  • Ling, R. (2020). Confirmation bias in the era of mobile news consumption: The social and psychological dimensions. Digital Journalism, 8(5), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1766987
  • McDermott, R. (2011). Internal and External Validity. In J. Druckman, D. Greene, J. Kuklinski, & A. Lupia (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science (pp. 27-40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921452.003
  • Nagatsu, M. (2015). Behavioral Economics, History of. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2, 443–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.03053-1
  • Osmani, S. R. (2019). Rationality, Behavioural Economics and Amartya Sen. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 20(2), 162–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2019.1565631
  • Peat, D. (2019). The Tyranny of Choice and the Interpretation of Standards: Why the ECtHR Uses Consensus. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3478004
  • Pigou, A. C. (2016). Protective and preferential import duties. Routledge
  • Puddephatt, A., & McLuhan, A. (2019). Generic Social Processes: Reimagining a Conceptual Schema for Grounded Theory in the Contemporary Era. Sociological Focus, 52(2), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2018.1544515
  • Puig, S. (2016, November 14). Blinding International Justice. Social Science Research Network. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2829098
  • Savulescu, J., Giubilini, A., & Danchin, M. (2021). Global Ethical Considerations regarding Mandatory Vaccination in Children. The Journal of Pediatrics, 231, 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.01.021
  • Schmitz, C. A. (1995). Changing the way we do business in international relations (No. 245). Cato Institute.
  • Slaughter, A. M. (2001). International Law and International Relations: Millenial Lectures. Receuil de Cours/Hague Academy of International Law, 9-250.
  • Slomp, G. (2018). As Thick as Thieves: Exploring Thomas Hobbes’ Critique of Ancient Friendship and its Contemporary Relevance. Political Studies, 67(1), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321718761243
  • Stewart, M. (2009). The management myth: Debunking modern business philosophy. WW Norton & Company.
  • Stoelhorst, J. W. (2017). Better Than Rational: A Naturalistic View of Economic Governance. Complexity, Governance & Networks, 3(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.20377/cgn-39
  • Strezhnev, A., Simmons, B. A., & Kim, M. D. (2019). Rulers or Rules? International Law, Elite Cues and Public Opinion. European Journal of International Law, 30(4), 1281–1302. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chaa002
  • Teichman, D., & Zamir, E. (2018). Behavioral Analysis of International Law: On Lawmaking and Nudging. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3110367
  • Teichman, D., & Zamir, E. (2019). Nudge Goes International. European Journal of International Law, 30(4), 1263–1279. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chaa007
  • Van Aaken, A. (2013). Behavioral International Law and Economics. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2342576
  • van Aaken, A. (2018). Rationalist and Behavioralist Approaches to International Law. International Legal Theory: Foundations and Frontiers (Cambridge University Press, 2019, Forthcoming)
  • van Aaken, A. (2019). Experimental Insights for International Legal Theory. European Journal of International Law, 30(4), 1237–1262. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chaa009
  • Villeval, M. C. (2020). Public goods, norms and cooperation. In Handbook of Experimental Game Theory (pp. 184-212). Edward Elgar Publishing
  • Voelkl, B., Altman, N. S., Forsman, A., Forstmeier, W., Gurevitch, J., Jaric, I., Karp, N. A., Kas, M. J., Schielzeth, H., Van de Casteele, T., & Würbel, H. (2020). Reproducibility of animal research in light of biological variation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 21(7), 384–393. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-020-0313-3
  • Wallace, G. P. R. (2013). International Law and Public Attitudes Toward Torture: An Experimental Study. International Organization, 67(1), 105–140. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818312000343
  • Zamir, E., & Ritov, I. (2012). Loss Aversion, Omission Bias, and the Burden of Proof in Civil Litigation. The Journal of Legal Studies, 41(1), 165–207. https://doi.org/10.1086/664911

References

  • ALLEN, D. W. (2014). The Coase theorem: coherent, logical, and not disproved. Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(2), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744137414000083
  • Andreis, F. de. (2020). A Theoretical Approach to the Effective Decision-Making Process. Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(06), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2020.106022
  • Bellamy, R., & Weale, A. (2015). Political legitimacy and European monetary union: contracts, constitutionalism and the normative logic of two-level games. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.995118
  • Blumenthal-Barby, J. S., & Krieger, H. (2014). Cognitive Biases and Heuristics in Medical Decision Making. Medical Decision Making, 35(4), 539–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x14547740
  • Broude, T. (2015). BEHAVIORAL INTERNATIONAL LAW. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 163(4), 1099–1157. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24752762
  • Conrad, C. R., & Ritter, E. H. (2013). Treaties, Tenure, and Torture: The Conflicting Domestic Effects of International Law. The Journal of Politics, 75(2), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381613000091
  • Delcourt, B. (2016). Political Economy of International Law: A Convenient Alliance for the Study of Compliance? In The Political Economy of International Law (pp. 159-177). Edward Elgar Publishing
  • Dhami, S., & al-Nowaihi, A. (2007). Why do people pay taxes? Prospect theory versus expected utility theory. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 64(1), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.08.006
  • Gaudet, S., Marchand, I., Bujaki, M., & Bourgeault, I. L. (2021). Women and gender equity in academia through the conceptual lens of care. Journal of Gender Studies, Journal of Gender Studies(1), 1– 13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2021.1944848
  • Hafner-Burton, E. M., LeVeck, B. L., & Victor, D. G. (2016). How Activists Perceive the Utility of International Law. The Journal of Politics, 78(1), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1086/683371
  • Heavey, C., Simsek, Z., Roche, F., & Kelly, A. (2009). Decision Comprehensiveness and Corporate Entrepreneurship: The Moderating Role of Managerial Uncertainty Preferences and Environmental Dynamism. Journal of Management Studies, 46(8), 1289–1314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00858.x
  • Hirsch, M. (2019). Cognitive Sociology, Social Cognition and Coping with Racial Discrimination in International Law. European Journal of International Law, 30(4), 1319–1338. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chaa003
  • Iberahim, M. M., & Tantikulanan, C. (2020). Indonesia’s Two-level Game at the WTO: A Political Economy Approach to the International Poultry Trade. Multi-dimensional Disruption in the Asia-Pacific.
  • Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., Fünfschilling, L., Hess, D., Holtz, G., Hyysalo, S., Jenkins, K., Kivimaa, P., Martiskainen, M., McMeekin, A., Mühlemeier, M. S., & Nykvist, B. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
  • Krook, M. L., & True, J. (2010). Rethinking the life cycles of international norms: The United Nations and the global promotion of gender equality. European Journal of International Relations, 18(1), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066110380963
  • Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45(2), 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0
  • Levitt, B. B., Lai, H. C., & Manville, A. M. (2021). Effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on flora and fauna, Part 3. Exposure standards, public policy, laws, and future directions. Reviews on Environmental Health, 37(4), 531–558. https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2021-0083
  • Liedtka, J. (2018). Why design thinking works. Harvard Business Review, 96(5), 72-79.
  • Ling, R. (2020). Confirmation bias in the era of mobile news consumption: The social and psychological dimensions. Digital Journalism, 8(5), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1766987
  • McDermott, R. (2011). Internal and External Validity. In J. Druckman, D. Greene, J. Kuklinski, & A. Lupia (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science (pp. 27-40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921452.003
  • Nagatsu, M. (2015). Behavioral Economics, History of. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2, 443–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.03053-1
  • Osmani, S. R. (2019). Rationality, Behavioural Economics and Amartya Sen. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 20(2), 162–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2019.1565631
  • Peat, D. (2019). The Tyranny of Choice and the Interpretation of Standards: Why the ECtHR Uses Consensus. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3478004
  • Pigou, A. C. (2016). Protective and preferential import duties. Routledge
  • Puddephatt, A., & McLuhan, A. (2019). Generic Social Processes: Reimagining a Conceptual Schema for Grounded Theory in the Contemporary Era. Sociological Focus, 52(2), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2018.1544515
  • Puig, S. (2016, November 14). Blinding International Justice. Social Science Research Network. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2829098
  • Savulescu, J., Giubilini, A., & Danchin, M. (2021). Global Ethical Considerations regarding Mandatory Vaccination in Children. The Journal of Pediatrics, 231, 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.01.021
  • Schmitz, C. A. (1995). Changing the way we do business in international relations (No. 245). Cato Institute.
  • Slaughter, A. M. (2001). International Law and International Relations: Millenial Lectures. Receuil de Cours/Hague Academy of International Law, 9-250.
  • Slomp, G. (2018). As Thick as Thieves: Exploring Thomas Hobbes’ Critique of Ancient Friendship and its Contemporary Relevance. Political Studies, 67(1), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321718761243
  • Stewart, M. (2009). The management myth: Debunking modern business philosophy. WW Norton & Company.
  • Stoelhorst, J. W. (2017). Better Than Rational: A Naturalistic View of Economic Governance. Complexity, Governance & Networks, 3(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.20377/cgn-39
  • Strezhnev, A., Simmons, B. A., & Kim, M. D. (2019). Rulers or Rules? International Law, Elite Cues and Public Opinion. European Journal of International Law, 30(4), 1281–1302. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chaa002
  • Teichman, D., & Zamir, E. (2018). Behavioral Analysis of International Law: On Lawmaking and Nudging. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3110367
  • Teichman, D., & Zamir, E. (2019). Nudge Goes International. European Journal of International Law, 30(4), 1263–1279. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chaa007
  • Van Aaken, A. (2013). Behavioral International Law and Economics. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2342576
  • van Aaken, A. (2018). Rationalist and Behavioralist Approaches to International Law. International Legal Theory: Foundations and Frontiers (Cambridge University Press, 2019, Forthcoming)
  • van Aaken, A. (2019). Experimental Insights for International Legal Theory. European Journal of International Law, 30(4), 1237–1262. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chaa009
  • Villeval, M. C. (2020). Public goods, norms and cooperation. In Handbook of Experimental Game Theory (pp. 184-212). Edward Elgar Publishing
  • Voelkl, B., Altman, N. S., Forsman, A., Forstmeier, W., Gurevitch, J., Jaric, I., Karp, N. A., Kas, M. J., Schielzeth, H., Van de Casteele, T., & Würbel, H. (2020). Reproducibility of animal research in light of biological variation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 21(7), 384–393. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-020-0313-3
  • Wallace, G. P. R. (2013). International Law and Public Attitudes Toward Torture: An Experimental Study. International Organization, 67(1), 105–140. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818312000343
  • Zamir, E., & Ritov, I. (2012). Loss Aversion, Omission Bias, and the Burden of Proof in Civil Litigation. The Journal of Legal Studies, 41(1), 165–207. https://doi.org/10.1086/664911

Cite this article

APA

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Nadeem, Saadat Ali, Samana Mehmood, and Malik Zia-ud-Din. 2023. "An Introduction to the Psychology of International Law." Global Legal Studies Review, VIII (I): 54-61 doi: 10.31703/glsr.2023(VIII-I).06

HARVARD

    HARVARD : NADEEM, S. A., MEHMOOD, S. & ZIA-UD-DIN, M. 2023. An Introduction to the Psychology of International Law. Global Legal Studies Review, VIII, 54-61.

MHRA

    MHRA : Nadeem, Saadat Ali, Samana Mehmood, and Malik Zia-ud-Din. 2023. "An Introduction to the Psychology of International Law." Global Legal Studies Review, VIII: 54-61

MLA

    MLA : Nadeem, Saadat Ali, Samana Mehmood, and Malik Zia-ud-Din. "An Introduction to the Psychology of International Law." Global Legal Studies Review, VIII.I (2023): 54-61 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Nadeem, Saadat Ali, Mehmood, Samana, and Zia-ud-Din, Malik (2023), "An Introduction to the Psychology of International Law", Global Legal Studies Review, VIII (I), 54-61

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Nadeem, Saadat Ali, Samana Mehmood, and Malik Zia-ud-Din. "An Introduction to the Psychology of International Law." Global Legal Studies Review VIII, no. I (2023): 54-61. https://doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2023(VIII-I).06