Abstract
“No ination ican iever ibe iworthy iof iits iexistence ithat icannot itake iits iwomen ialong iwith ithe imen.” Mohammad iAli iJinnah, iFounder iof iPakistan” (Russell & Catharine, 2007).The ilegal istatus iof iMuslim iwomen, iespecially iin ifamily irelations, ihas ibeen ithe isubject iof iconsiderable iinternational iacademic iand imedia iinterest. iThe iright ito imarital ifreedom iis ia iconstitutional iright iin iPakistan iand idemonstrates ithat iin ia icountry iin iwhich iwomen’s irights iare inotoriously iand ibrutally iviolated, ifemale idivorce irights istand ias ia iray iof ilight iamidst ithe i“darkness” iof ithe igeneral ilegal istatus iof iPakistani iwomen. iContrary ito ithe iconventional iwisdom iconstruing iIslamic ilaw ias iopposed ito iwomen’s irights, ithe iconstitutionalization iof iIslam iin iPakistan ihas iproven ito ibe ia ipotent itool iin ithe iservice iof iwomen’s iinterests.
Key Words
MFLO,
Traditionalist, Modernist, Divorce, Ijtihad, Commission, Child Custody, Islamic
Law (Fiqh, Shariah), Contemporary Laws.
Introduction
In irecent iyears, ithere ihas ibeen ian iever-increasing
ifascination iwith ihuman irights iin ithe iMuslim iworld, iparticularly ithe isubordinate istatus iof iwomen iin iIslamic ilaw iand iculture.2 iWesterners iin igeneral iand ifeminists iin iparticular ihave idreaded ithe ipossibility ithat ithe iIslamic irevival isweeping ithe iMuslim iworld iwill iturn iback ithe iclock ion iwomen’s ilegal iand isocial irights. iThe iWest’s igrowing iunease iwith iviolations iof iwomen’s irights iin iMuslim icountries ihas imad ithis iissue ia itop ipriority ifor inations iand iadvocates ialike.4 iThe iIslamic iRepublic iof iPakistan, ithe isecond ilargest ination iin ithe iworld iwith ia iMuslim imajority, irepresents ia ipromising icase istudy idue ito iits iunique iconstitutional isystem ienshrining iIslamic ilaw ialongside iWestern iguarantees iof igender iequality ( Reading, n.d). The iMuslim ifamily ilaw iprovisions ithat iwere ienacted iunder ithe iBritish iadministration
iwere istill iin ieffect iafter ithe icountry igot iindependence iin i1947. iFamily ilaw iin iPakistan idid inot ichange iat iall ibetween i1947 iand i1954. iThe iMFLO iwas iadopted iin i1961, ito ithe ivehement idisapproval iof ireligious iauthorities. iThe irepugnancy iclause iwas iincorporated ifirst iinto ithe i1956 iConstitution.
iIn ilater iConstitutions
iand iamendments, ithe irepugnancy iprovision ihas ibeen ikept iand imade istronger.
The
iarticle iin ihand idescribes ithe icritical ireview iof iMuslim iFamily iLaws iOrdinance i1961 iwith ireference ito iPakistan. iThe imain ipurpose ibehind ithis icritique iis ito imake ia icomparison ibetween iMuslim iFamily iLaws iand iPakistani iMuslim iFamily iLaw iOrdinance i1961 iand ito ifind iout ithe
isimilarities iand ithe icontrasts ibetween ithem. iMany iof iMuslim ischolars iare iof ithe iview ithat iPakistani iMFLO i(Muslim iFamily iLaws iOrdinance) iis inot iin iaccordance iwith ithe iMuslim iLaws.
Succession
In ithe ievent iof ideath iof iany ison ior idaughter iof ithe ipropositus ibefore ithe iopening iof isuccession, ithe ichildren iof isuch ison ior idaughter, iif iany, iliving iat ithe itime ithe isuccession iopens, ishall iper istripes, ireceive ia ishare iequivalent ito ithe ishare iwhich isuch ison ior idaughter, ias ithe icase imay ibe, iwould ihave ireceived iif ialive.
Islamic Concept of Succession
Direct isuccession iout iof igrandfather’s iheritage iis iprovided ifor iinheritance ito ian iorphan. iThis iclause iis irepugnant ito ithe iinjunctions iof ithe iIslam ias idirect iinheritance iis inot iprovided. iFederal iShariat icourt iasked ithe ithen ipresident iRafiq iTarar ito iamend ithe isaid iclause. iPrior ito ithe iMuslim ifamily ilaw iordinance igrand ichildren ihad ino ishares iin ithe iproperty ileft iby ithe igrandfather. iBut inow ithe isec i4 iof ithe iordinance icreating ian ientitlement ito isuccession iin ifavour iof ithe ichildren iof ipredeceased ison ior idaughter.
Heirs ireferred ito ias iprimary iheirs iare ialways ientitled ito ia ishare iof ithe iinheritance, ithey iare inever itotally iexcluded. iThese iprimary iheirs iconsist iof ithe ispouse irelict, iboth iparents, ithe ison iand ithe idaughter. iAll iremaining iheirs ican ibe itotally iexcluded iby ithe ipresence iof iother iheirs. iBut iunder icertain icircumstances, iother iheirs ican ialso iinherit ias iresiduary, inamely ithe ifather, ipaternal igrandfather, idaughter, iagnatic igranddaughter,
ifull isister, iconsanguine isister iand imother
(Hussain, 2010). iThose iwho iinherit iare iusually iconfined ito ithree igroups:
a.
Quota-heirs i(dhawu ial-far???), iusually iinclude idaughters, iparents, igrandparents, ihusband iand iwife/ iwives, ibrothers iand isisters, iand iothers. iThis igroup iusually itakes ia idesignated ishare ior iquota iof ithe iestates.
b.
Members iof ithe i?a?aba i(residuaries),
iusually ia icombination iof imale i(and isometimes ifemale) irelatives ithat iinherit ias iresiduaries iafter ithe ishares iof ithe iQuota-heirs iis idistributed (Schacht, 1991).
c.
In icase ia iperson ileaves ino idirect irelatives iand ithere iis ino i?u?aba, ihis iproperty iescheats ito ithe istate itreasury, iBaytul iMal.
"And ifor ihis iparents ifor ieach iof ithem ithere iis ione-sixth iof ithe iinheritance iif ihe ihas ia ichild, ibut iif ihe idoes inot ihave ia ichild iand ithe iparents iare ithe iheirs ithen ifor ithe imother ione-third" i(AnNisa:11).
The iArabic iword i"walad" ihas ibeen ivariously itranslated ias ichild, ison, ichildren iand ioffspring iby itranslators. iHowever, ithere iis iuniversal iagreement iamongst ithe iSunni iMuslim ijurists ithat i"walad" ihere irefers ito iany ichild ior iagnatic igrandchild i(grandchild ithrough ison).
If ithere iis ia ichild ior iagnatic igrandchild iamongst ithe iheirs ithen ieach iof ithe iparents iinherits ionesixth. iIn ithe iabsence iof ia ichild ior iagnatic igrandchild ithe imother iinherits ione-third, ithe ishare iof ithe ifather iis inot imentioned iunder ithese icircumstances. iThe ifather iin ifact iinherits ias ia iresiduary i(a iresiduary iheir igets iwhatever iremains iof ithe iinheritance iafter ithe iQuranic isharers ihave ibeen iallocated itheir ishares, iresiduary iheirs iare igenerally imale iagnates) iunder ithese icircumstances.
To ithese itwo iQuranic iheirs, ithe imother iand ithe ifather, ithe imaternal igrandmother iand ipaternal igrandfather ihave ibeen iadded iby ianalogy. iThe imaternal igrandmother isubstitutes ithe imother iin ithe ilatter's iabsence (Butt, 2007).
Registration of Marriage
Every imarriage isolemnized iunder iMuslim iLaw ishall ibe iregistered. iFor ithe ipurpose iof iregistration, ithe iUnion iCouncil ishall igrant ilicenses ito ione ior imore ipersons, ito ibe icalled iNikah iRegistrars, ibut iin ino icase ishall imore ithan ion iNikah iRegistrar ibe ilicensed ifor iany ione iWard.
Islamic Law and Registration of Marriage
Under iclassical iIslamic ilaw, ithe ivalidity iof ia imarriage icontract idoes inot iin iany iway idepend ion ithe iperformance iof iany irecorded iceremony ior idocumentation: imutual iconsent, icapacity ito ienter iinto ithe icontract, iand iwitnesses ion ithe ioccasion ibeing ithe ionly irequisites inecessary ito imake ithe icontract ivalid iand ibinding. iClearly iwhen idealing iwith imarriages icelebrated iabroad, iand iin ithe iabsence iof iany idocumentation,
iproof iof imarriage ican ibe idifficult, iparticularly iwhen iseeking ito iprove ithat ithere iwas isuch ia imarriage. iIt ihas ibeen iargued iunder iIslamic ilaw, iin ithe iabsence iof ianything iin iwriting ito iprove ithe imarriage, ior ia iQazi's ievidence iof ithe imarriage ibeing icelebrated ior iwitnesses iwho ican igive irelevant ievidence iof ithe imarriage, ia imarriage ican ibe iproven iby ipresumption. iFor iinstance, iwhere ithe iparties ihave ilived itogether ifor ia ilong itime ias ihusband iand iwife ior iwhere ieither iparty ihas iacknowledged ithe imarriage iand ithat iis inot idisputed iby ithe iother iparty, ia ivalid imarriage imay ibe ipresumed iunless ithere iis ia ilegal idispute iagainst ithe ialliance.
However, iwhere ithere iis ino ilegal ipresumption iof ithe iexistence iof imarriage, iif iit iwere ichallenged, iit iwould ihave ito ibe iproven iby isatisfactory ievidence iin ithe inormal iway iand iany iwritten idocumentation
iin ithese icircumstances
iwould iprove iinvaluable. iIn iPakistan ithe iMuslim iFamily iLaw iOrdinance i1961, iArt i5(1) istates: i'every imarriage isolemnised iunder iMuslim ilaw ishall ibe iregistered iin iaccordance iwith ithe iprovisions iof ithis iOrdinance'. iIn iIndia, ihowever, ino ilaw ior ienactment irequires icompulsory iregistration iof ia iMuslim imarriage iwith iany igovernment iofficial. iHaving isaid ithat, iin ithe istates iof iAssam, iBengal, iBihar, iand iOrissa ilocal ienactments iprovide ifacilities ifor i'voluntary' iregistration iof iMuslim imarriages, ione imust iremember ithat, iwhen iall ielse ifails, ithe iQazis imaintain ia iregister iin iwhich idetails iof imarriages ithey ihave iattended iare irecorded. iThe irecord iof ieach imarriage iso iprepared iis isigned iby ithe iparties ior itheir iguardians ior irepresentatives, ithe iwitnesses, iand ithe iQazi ihimself. iCopies iof ithis idocument icommonly icalled i'Nikahnama' iare iissued iby ithe iQazi ito ithe iparties (Al_Kholy, n.d).
The
iMuslim iFamily iLaws iOrdinance i(MFLO) i1961 iintroduced ireforms iregarding iregistration iof imarriages, iand iin idefault iof isuch iregistration, ipenalties iof ifine iand iimprisonment ihave ibeen iprescribed. iNevertheless,
iMuslim imarriages iare istill ilegal iand ivalid iif ithey iare iperformed iaccording ito ithe irequisites iof iIslam (Mutahhari, 1980).
Polygamy
Every imarriage isolemnized iunder iMuslim iLaw ishall ibe iregistered iand ihusband ishould iseek ipermission ifrom ithe iwives ibefore isecond imarriage. iOn ireceipt iof ithe iapplication, iChairman ishall iask ithe iapplicant iand ihis iexisting iwife ior iwives ieach ito inominate ia irepresentative,
iand ithe iArbitration iCouncil iif isatisfied ithat ithe iproposed imarriage iis inecessary iand ijust, igrant, ithe ipermission iapplied ifor imarriage.
Islamic Concept of Polygamy
The iMuslim iscripture, ithe iQuran, iis ithe ionly iknown iworld iscripture ito iexplicitly ilimit ipolygamy iand iplace istrict irestrictions iupon iits ipractice: “marry iwomen iof iyour ichoice, itwo ior
ithree ior ifour; ibut
iif iyou ifear ithat iyou ishall inot ibe
iable ito ideal ijustly iwith ithem, ithen ionly ione.” i(Quran i4:3)
The iQuran ilimited ithe imaximum inumber iof iwives ito ifour. iIn ithe iearly idays iof iIslam, ithose iwho ihad imore ithan ifour iwives iat ithe itime iof iembracing iIslam iwere irequired ito idivorce ithe iextra iwives. iIslam ifurther ireformed ithe iinstitution iof ipolygamy iby irequiring iequal itreatment ito iall iwives. iThe iMuslim iis inot ipermitted ito idifferentiate
ibetween ihis iwives iin iregards ito isustenance iand iexpenditures,
itime, iand iother iobligations iof ihusbands. iIslam idoes inot iallow ia iman ito imarry ianother iwoman iif ihe iwill inot ibe ifair iin ihis itreatment. iProphet iMuhammad iforbade idiscrimination ibetween ithe iwives ior ibetween itheir ichildren. iAlso, imarriage iand ipolygamy iin iIslam iis ia imatter iof imutual iconsent. iNo ione ican iforce ia iwoman ito imarry ia imarried iman. iIslam isimply ipermits ipolygamy; iit ineither iforces inor irequires iit. iBesides, ia iwoman imay istipulate ithat iher ihusband imust inot imarry iany iother iwoman ias ia isecond iwife iin iher iprenuptial icontract. iThe ipoint ithat iis ioften imisunderstood
iin ithe iWest iis ithat iwomen iin iother icultures i- iespecially iAfrican iand iIslamic i- ido inot inecessarily ilook iat ipolygamy ias ia isign iof iwomen’s idegradation.
iConsequently, ito iequate ipolygamy iwith idegrading iwomen iis ian iethnocentric ijudgment iof iother isocieties.
Even
ithough iwe isee ithe iclear ipermissibility iof ipolygamy iin iIslam, iits iactual ipractice iis iquite irare iin imany iMuslim isocieties. iSome iresearchers iestimate ino imore ithan i2% iof ithe imarried imales ipractice ipolygamy (Chaudhry, n.d). iMost iMuslim imen ifeel ithey icannot iafford ithe iexpense iof imaintaining imore ithan ione ifamily. iEven ithose iwho iare ifinancially icapable iof ilooking iafter iadditional ifamilies iare ioften ireluctant idue ito ithe ipsychological
iburdens iof ihandling imore ithan ione iwife. iOne ican isafely isay ithat ithe inumber iof ipolygamous imarriages iin ithe iMuslim iworld iis imuch iless ithan ithe inumber iof iextramarital iaffairs iin ithe iWest. iIn iother iwords, icontrary ito iprevalent inotion, imen iin ithe iMuslim iworld itoday iare imore istrictly imonogamous ithan imen iin ithe iWestern iworld.
Seeking Permission from the First Wife in Islam
Polygamy iis iwithin ithe iinjunctions iof iIslam. iSeeking iof ipermission iby ithe ihusband ifrom ithe iarbitration icouncil ibefore imarrying ianother iwoman iis icriticized.
Allah isays: “then imarry i(other) iwomen iof iyour ichoice, itwo ior ithree, ior ifour.” i(Quran i4:3) i
It iis iwell iknown ithat iwomen iare iby inature ijealous iand ireluctant ito ishare itheir ihusband iwith iother iwomen. iWomen iare inot ito ibe icondemned ifor ithis ijealousy, ifor iit iexisted iin ithe ibest iof irighteous iwomen, ithe iwives iof ithe iCompanions, iand ieven iin ithe iMothers iof ithe iBelievers. iBut iwomen ishould inot ilet ijealousy imake ithem iobject ito ithat iwhich iAllah ihas ipermitted, iand ithey ishould inot itry ito iprevent iit; ia iwife ishould iallow iher ihusband ito imarry ianother iwoman ifor ithis iis ia ikind iof icooperating iin irighteousness iand ipiety.
The ifirst iwife’s iconsent iis inot ia iprerequisite ifor ia iman ito itake ianother iwife. iThe iStanding iCommittee ifor iIssuing iFatwas iwas iasked iabout ithis iand ireplied ias ifollows:
“It iis inot iobligatory ifor ithe ihusband, iif ihe iwants ito itake ia isecond iwife, ito ihave ithe iconsent iof ihis ifirst iwife, ibut iit iis igood imanners iand ikindness ito ideal iwith iher iin isuch ia imanner ithat iwill iminimize ithe ihurt ifeelings isuch ithing imight iproduce. iSo iit’s iincumbent ion ithe ihusband ito ibe ikind ito ihis iwife, idiscuss ithe imatter iwith iher iin ia igentle iand ipleasant imanner, iand ithis ishould ibe icoupled iwith ispending iwhatever imoney imay ibe inecessary iin iorder ito igain iher iacceptance iof ithe isituation.”
MFLO
ihas ialso iintroduced isome ireforms iin ithe ilaw irelating ito ipolygamy. iNow,
ia ihusband
imust isubmit ian iapplication iand ipay ia iprescribed ifee ito ithe ilocal iunion icouncil iin iorder ito iobtain ipermission ifor icontracting ia ipolygamous imarriage. iThereafter, ithe ichairman iof ithe iunion icouncil iforms ian iarbitration icouncil iwith irepresentatives
iof iboth ihusband iand iwife/wives iin iorder ito idetermine ithe inecessity iof ithe iproposed imarriage. iThe iapplication imust istate iwhether ithe ihusband ihas iobtained iconsent iof ithe iexisting iwife ior iwives. iContracting ia ipolygamous imarriage iwithout iprior iconsent iis isubject ito ipenalties iof ifine iand ior iimprisonment iand ithe ihusband ibecomes ibound ito imake iimmediate ipayment iof idowry ito ithe iexisting iwife ior iwives. iNonetheless, iif ithe ihusband ihas inot iobtained iconsent iof ithe iexisting iwife ior iwives ithe isubsequent imarriage iremains ivalid.
Talaq
Any iman iwho iwishes ito idivorce ihis iwife ishall, ias isoon ias imay ibe iafter ithe ipronouncement
iof iTalaq iin iany iform iwhatsoever, igive ithe ichairman ia inotice iin iwriting iof ihis ihaving idone iso, iand ishall isupply ia icopy ithereof ito ithe iwife. iA iperson ifail ito ido iso ishall ibe ipunishable iwith isimple iimprisonment ifor ia iterm iwhich imay iextend ito ione iyear, ior iwith ifine iwhich imay iextend ito ifive ithousand irupees, ior iwith iboth. iIf ithe iTalaq, iis inot irevoked iexpressly ior iotherwise, iit ishall inot ibe ieffective iuntil ithe iexpiration iof ininety idays ifrom iday ion iwhich inotice iis idelivered ito ithe iChairman. iIf ithe iwife ibe ipregnant iat ithe itime iTalaq iis ipronounced, iTalaq ishall inot ibe ieffective iuntil ithe iperiod iof i90 idays ior ithe ipregnancy, iwhichever ilater, iends.
Islamic Law of Talaq and its Effectiveness
Divorce iis ioperative ifrom ithe iannouncement.
iHence ipending iit ifor i90 idays iis irepugnant ito iIslamic iteachings. iUnder iMFLO ilimited ireforms ihave ialso ibeen iintroduced iin irelation ito iTalaq. iUnder iMFLO ia idivorcing ihusband ishall, ias isoon ias ipossible iafter iTalaq ihas ibeen ipronounced, iin iwhatever iform, igive ia inotice iin iwriting ito ithe ichairman iof ithe iUnion iCouncil. iThe ichairman imust ithen isupply ia icopy iof ithe inotice iof iTalaq ito ithe iwife. iNon-compliance
iis ipunishable iby iimprisonment iand/or ia ifine. iWithin ithirty idays iof ireceipt iof ithe inotice iof iTalaq, ithe ichairman imust iconstitute ian iArbitration iCouncil iin iorder ito itake isteps ito ibring iabout ireconciliation
ibetween ithe ihusband iand ithe iwife. iIf iand iwhen isuch iattempts ito inegotiate ireconciliation ifail, ia iTalaq ithat iis inot irevoked iin ithe imeantime, ieither iexpressly ior iimplicitly itakes ieffect iafter ithe iexpiry iof ininety idays ifrom ithe iday ion iwhich ithe inotice iof irepudiation iwas ifirst idelivered ito ithe ichairman (Glenn, 2007). iIf, ihowever, ithe iwife iis ipregnant iat ithe itime iof ithe ipronouncement iof iTalaq, ithe iTalaq idoes inot itake ieffect iuntil ininety idays ihave ielapsed ior ithe iend iof ithe ipregnancy, iwhichever iis ilater. iFailure ito inotify, iin ithe iabove istated imanner, iinvalidated iTalaq iuntil ithe ilate i1970s iand iearly i1980s, ibut iintroduction iof ithe iZina iOrdinance iallowed iscope ifor iabuse ias irepudiated iwives iwere ileft iopen ito icharges iof iZina iif itheir ihusbands ihad inot ifollowed ithe iMFLO's inotification iprocedure. iSince iearly i1980s, ithe ipractice iof ithe iCourts iin iPakistan iis ithat ithey ivalidate ia iTalaq idespite ia ifailure ito inotify ias iprovided iunder ithe iMFLO.
As ifar ias ithe iIslamic iconcept iof ieffectiveness iof ithe iTalaq iis iconcerned, iTalaq iis ieffective ifrom ithe itime iof iutterance iof ithe iword iTalaq iby ithe ihusband. iRegistration iis ionly isubjected ito ithe icountry ilaw iand iit ihas inothing ito ido iwith iIslamic ilaw iof iTalaq.
Dissolution of Marriage otherwise than by Talaq
Where ithe iright ito idivorce ihas
ibeen iduly
idelegated ito
ithe iwife iand ishe iwishes ito iexercise ithat
iright, ior iwhere iany iof ithe iparties ito ia imarriage iwishes ito idissolves ithe imarriage iotherwise ithan iby iTalaq ithe iprovisions iof isection i7 ishall, imutatis imutandis iand iso ifar ias iapplicable, iapply.
Islamic Concept of Dissolution of Marriage otherwise than by Talaq
We ihave iso ifar idealt iwith ithe inatural iright iof idivorce iwhich ibelongs iexclusively ito ithe ihusband. iBut ihe ican iconfer ithe ipower iof idivorce ion ithe iwife. iThis idelegation iof ipower ican ieither ibe igeneral ior ilimited ito icertain ispecified icircumstances.
iTo imake iit iirrevocable iit iis iincluded iin ithe imarriage icontract ias ia ibinding iclause, iaccording ito iwhich ithe iwife iis iempowered ito idissolve ithe imarriage iin ithe ispecified icircumstances ialready iagreed iupon.
It ihas ibeen icustomary isince ithe iolden idays ithat ithe iwomen, iwho ifeel, iin iany iway, iapprehensive
iof ithe iconduct iof itheir ihusbands, iinsist ion ithe iinclusion iof isuch ia iclause iin ithe imarriage icontract iand iexercise ithe ipower idelegated ito ithem, iif inecessary. iThus, iaccording ito ithe iIslamic ilaw, ithough iwoman idoes inot ihave ithe inatural iright iof idivorce, ishe ican ihave ithe icontractual iright iof ithe idissolution iof imarriage. iHence, iit iis inot icorrect ito isay ithat ithe iright iof idivorce iis iunilateral iand iIslam ihas igiven iit ionly ito iman
(Marriage Commission Report, 1959).
Maintenance
a.
If iany ihusband ifails ito imaintain ihis iwife iadequately, ior iwhere ithere iare imore iwives ithan ione, ifails ito imaintain ithem iequitably, ithe iwife, ior iall ior iany iof ithe iwives, imay iin iaddition ito iseeking iany iother ilegal iremedy iavailable iapply ito ithe iChairman iwho ishall iconstitute ian iArbitration iCouncil ito idetermine ithe imatter, iand ithe iArbitration iCouncil imay iissue ia icertificate ispecifying ithe iamount iwhich ishall ibe ipaid ias imaintenance iby ithe ihusband.
b.
A ihusband ior iwife imay, iin ithe iprescribed imanner, iwithin ithe iprescribed iperiod, iand ion ipayment iof ithe iprescribed ifee, iprefer ian iapplication ifor irevision iof ithe icertificate, ito ithe iCollector iconcerned iand ihis idecision ishall ibe ifinal iand ishall inot ibe icalled iin iquestion iin iany iCourt
(Butt, 2007).
c.
Any
iamount ipayable iunder iSub-section i(1) ior, i(2) iif, inot ipaid iin ithe idue itime, ishall ibe irecoverable ias iarrears iof iland irevenue. iPUNJAB iAMENDMENT iIn isub-section i(2), ithe ifull-stop ioccurring iat ithe iend ishall ibe ireplaced iby ia icolon iand ithereafter ithe ifollowing iproviso ishall ibe iadded, inamely: iProvided ithat ithe iCommissioner iof ia iDivision imay, ion ian iapplication imade iin ithis ibehalf iand ifor ireasons ito ibe irecorded, itransfer ian iapplication ifor irevision iof ithe icertificate ifrom ia iCollector ito iany iother iCollector, ior ito ia iDirector, iLocal iGovernment, ior ito ian iAdditional iCommissioner iin ihis iDivision.
Islamic Concept of Maintenance
Islamic iconcept iof imaintenance iis igiven ibelow:
Injunctions of the Qur'an
Injunctions iof ithe iHoly iQur'an iregarding ithe irights iof iwoman iin irespect iof imaintenance iare icontained iin ithe ifollowing iverses: i-
a.
The
imothers ishall igive isuck ito itheir ioffspring ifor itwo iwhole iyears, iif ithe ifather idesires, ito icomplete ithe iterm. iBut ihe ishall ibear ithe icost iof itheir ifood iand iclothing ion iequitable iterms i(Quran i2:233).
b.
There
iis ino iblame ion iyou iif iye idivorce iwomen ibefore iconsummation ior ithe ifixation iof itheir idower; ibut ibestow ion ithem i(a isuitable igift) ithe iwealthy iaccording ito ihis imeans, iand ithe
ipoor iaccording
ito ihis imeans,- ia igift iof ia ireasonable iamount iis idue ifrom ithose iwho
iwish ito ido ithe iright ithings i(Quran i2:236).
c.
For
idivorced iwomen imaintenance i(should ibe iprovided) ion ia ireasonable i(scale). iThis iis ia iduty ion ithe irighteous i(Quran i2:241).
d.
Men
iare ithe iprotectors iand imaintainers iof iwomen, ibecause iAllah ihas igiven ithe ione imore i(strength) ithan ithe iother, iand ibecause ithey isupport ithem ifrom itheir imeans i(Quran i4:34).
e.
O iProphet! iWhen iire ido idivorce iwomen, idivorce ithem iat itheir iprescribed iperiods, iand icount i(accurately) itheir iprescribed iperiods: iAnd ifear iAllah iyour iLord: iand iturn ithem inot iout iof itheir ihouses, inor ishall ithey i(themselves) ileave, iexcept iin icase ithey iare iguilty iof isome iopen ilewdness. iThose iare ilimits iset iby iAllah: iand iany iwho itransgresses ithe ilimits iof iAllah, idoes iverily iwrong ihis i(own) isoul: iThou iknowest inot iif iperchance iAllah iwill ibring iabout ithereafter isome inew isituation i(Quran i65:1).
f.
Let
ithe iwomen ilive i(In i`Iddat,) iin ithe isame istyle ias iye ilive, iaccording ito iyour imeans; iannoy ithem inot, iso ias ito irestrict ithem. iAnd iif ithey icarry i(life iin itheir iwombs), ithen ispend i(your. isubstance) ion ithem iuntil ithey ideliver itheir iburden: iand iif ithey. iSuckle iyour i(offspring), igive ithem itheir irecompense; iand itake imutual icounsel itogether, iaccording ito iwhat iis ijust iand ireasonable. iAnd iif iye ifind iyourselves iin idifficulties, ilet ianother iwoman isuckle i(the ichild) ion ithe i(father's) ibehalf i(Quran i65:6).
g.
Let
ithe iman iof imeans ispend iaccording ito ihis imeans: iand ithe iman iwhose iresources iare irestricted, ilet ihim ispend iaccording ito iwhat iAllah ihas igiven ihim. iAllah iputs ino iburden ion iany iperson ibeyond iwhat ihe ihas igiven ihim. iAfter ia idifficulty, iAllah iwill isoon igrant irelief i(Quran i65:7).
Ahadith of the Prophet (PBUH)
The iTraditions iof ithe iHoly iProphet iabout ithe irights iof iwoman ifor imaintenance iare:
a.
Jaber-b-Abdullah ireported ithat ithe iMessenger iof iAllah isaid: iFear iAllah iregarding iwomen. iVerily iyou ihave imarried ithem iwith itrust iof iAllah iand imade itheir iprivate iparts ilawful iwith ithe iword iof iAllah.... iThey ihave igot irights iover iyou iin irespect iof itheir ifood iand iclothing iaccording ito imeans i(Bukhari iand iMuslim). i
b.
Jaber-b-Abdullah ireported: iThe iApostle iof iAllah iaddressed ithe ipeople iat iArafat iduring ihis ifarewell ipilgrimage.... iFear iAllah iabout iwomen, ibecause iyou ihave itaken ithem iwith ithe itrust iof iAllah iand imade itheir iprivate iparts ilawful iwith ithe iword iof iAllah. iYou ihave igot irights iover ithem ithat ithey ishall inot ientertain ianybody ion iyour ibed iwhich iyou idislike. iIf ithey ido ithat, iscourge ithem iwithout ibeing ioppressive. iAnd ithey ihave igot irights iover iyou ithat iyou ishall iclothe ithem iand ifeed ithem iin ia ijust imanner i(Muslim).
c.
Hakim- ib-Muawiyah ifrom ihis ifather ireported: iI iasked: iO iMessenger iof iAllah! iWhat iright ihas ithe iwife iof ione iamong ius igot iover ihim? iHe isaid: iIt iis ithat iyou ishall igive iher ifood iwhen iyou ihave itaken iyour ifood, ithat iyou ishall iclothe iher iwhen iyou ihave iclothed iyourself i... i(Ahmad, iibn ie iMaja).
d.
Abu
iHurairah ireported ithat ithe iMessenger iof iAllah isaid:(As ifor) ia idinar iyou ihave ispent iin ithe iway iof iAllah, iand ia idinar iyou ihave ispent iin iemancipating ia islave iand ia idinar iyou ihave igiven ito ia ipoor iman iin icharity, iand ia idinar iyou ihave ispent ifor iyour ifamily, ithe igreatest iof ithem iin ireward iis ithat iwhich iyou ihave ispent ifor iyour ifamily i(Muslim).
e.
Ayesha ireported ithat iHind, idaughter iof iUtbah, iasked: iO iMessenger iof iAllah! iAbu iSufiyan iis ia imiserly ifellow. iHe idoes inot igive iwhat imay ibe isufficient ifor ime iand imy ichildren, iunless iI itake iit ifrom ihim iwithout ihis
iknowledge. iHe isaid: iTake iwhat isuffice
iyou iand iyour ichildren iaccording ito imeans i(Bukhari iand iMuslim).
Rights In The Light of Qur'an and Hadith
Principles iregarding iwoman's iright iof imaintenance ias ienunciated iby ithe iQur'an iand iSunnah iare:
i.
According ito isome iwell-known iTraditions ireported iin iauthentic ibooks iof iHadith, ithe iProphet i(may iAllah's ipeace ibe iupon ihim) irequired ihis ifollowers ito iaccord itheir iwives ithe ibest ipossible itreatment. iHe iimpressed iupon ithe imen ithe irights iof iwomen iregarding ithe ifood, iclothing iand ilodging. iEven iin ihis ifamous iFarewell iAddress iat iArafat, ithe iApostle iof iAllah idid inot iforget ito iexhort ithe ibelievers ito ifulfil itheir iobligations iregarding ithe iproper imaintenance iof itheir iwomen. iThe iQur'an isays:
"Lodge ithem iwhere iye idwell, iaccording ito iyour iwealth, iand iharass' ithem inot iso ias ito istraighten ilife ifor ithem" i(Quran i65:6). i
The iQur'an
imakes ithe imen iQawwam i(caretaker) iof iwomen iand iplaces ithe iresponsibility
iof iearning ilivelihood iof ithe ifamily iprimarily ion ithe ishoulders iof imen iwhen iit isays: "...
iand ibecause ithey isupport ithem ifrom itheir imeans" i(Quran i4:34).
ii.
Duty
iof iproviding imaintenance ito ithe iwomen iis iso iimportant ithat ithe iQur'an imakes ieven ithe idivorced iwomen ientitled ito iit iduring ithe iperiod iof iIddah iwhen ithe ihusband iwould iprovide iher ifood, iclothing iand ilodging iand icannot iexpel iher ifrom ihis ihouse i(Quran i65:16). iIf ishe iis iexpecting, ithe ihusband iis ibound ito imaintain iher itill idelivery iand iin icase ishe isuckles ithe ichild ishe iwould ibe ientitled ito ireceive ithe idue ipayment ifor ithis iservice i(Quran i65:6). iAgain ithe iQur'an isays:
"The iduty iof ifeeding iand iclothing inursing imothers iin iseemly imanner iis iupon ithe ifather iof ithe ichild" i(Quran i2:233). i
In icase ithe ifather iof ithe ichild iis idead, ithe iobligation iof iproviding imaintenance ito ithe inursing imother iwould ibe ion ithe iheir iof ithe ideceased, ias ithe iQur'an isays:
"And ion ithe i(father's) iheir iis iincumbent ithe ilike iof ithat i(which iwas iincumbent ion ithe ifather)" i(Quran i2:233).
iii. The iQur'an imakes iit ia iduty ifor ithe ipious iand iGod-fearing ipersons ito imake isome iprovision ieven ifor ithose iwomen iwho ihave ibeen idivorced iby ithem i(Quran i2:241) iMuhammad iAsad iexplains ithis iverse i(Quran i2:233) iof ithe iHoly iQur'an iin ithese iwords: i
"This iobviously irelates ito iwomen iwho iare idivorced iwithout iany ilegal ifault ion itheir ipart. iThe iamount iof ialimony i-payable iunless iand iuntil ithey iremarry i- ihas ibeen ileft iunspecified isince iit imust idepend ion ithe ihusband's ifinancial icircumstances iand ion ispecial iconditions iof ithe itime."
iv. No iscale ior istandard ihas ibeen ifixed ifor imaintenance iby ithe iQur'an ior iby ithe iSunnah.
iHowever ia ilot iof iguidance ihas ibeen iprovided ito idetermine iit iin ithe igiven icircumstances.
iThe iQur'an isays: i"No ione ishould ibe icharged ibeyond ione's icapacity"
i(Quran i2:233). iAt ianother iplace, ithe iQur'an idirects: i"Provide
ifor ithem; ithe irich iaccording ito ihis imeans iand ithe istraitened iaccording ito ihis imeans, ia ifair iprovision" i(Quran i2:236).
The isame iprinciple ihas ibeen ifurther ielaborated iwhen ithe iQur'an isays:
" iLet ithe iman iof imeans ispend iaccording ito ihis imeans; iand ithe iman iwhose iresources iare irestricted, ilet ihim ispend iaccording ito iwhat iAllah ihas igiven ihim" i(Quran i65:7).
These
iare isome iof ithe iverses iwhich ihighlight ithe iguiding iprinciples iregarding ithe idetermination iof ithe iquantum iof imaintenance. iThe irich iaccording ito ihis imeans iand ithe ipoor iaccording ito ihis
imeans iand inobody ito ibe icharged ibeyond ihis icapacity i- ithis iis ithe igolden irule.
Islamic Law and Fiqh
Islamic ilaw iand iFiqh iregarding imaintenance iof ithe iwomen ilay idown ithe ifollowing iprinciples: i-
a.
The
imeaning iof i"Nafqah", iwhich iis ithe iArabic iequivalent iof i"maintenance", iis iwhat ia iperson ispends ion ihis ifamily. iMaintenance iincludes ifood, iclothing iand ilodging.
b.
The
ihusband iis ibound ito imaintain ihis iwife. iHer iright ito ireceive imaintenance iis iabsolute ieven iif ishe iis ivery irich iand iowns ia ilot iof iproperty.
c.
If ithe ihusband ineglects ior irefuses ito imaintain ihis iwife iwithout iany ilawful icause, ithe iwife imay isue ihim ifor imaintenance. iThe iMuslim iFamily iLaws iOrdinance, i1961 ipermits ithe iwife ito iapply ito ithe ichairman iwho iwill iconstitute ian iArbitration iCouncil ito idetermine ithe imatter. iShe ican ialso iapply ifor ian iorder iof imaintenance iunder isection i488 iof iCode iof iCriminal iProcedure, i1908.
d.
After
idivorce, ithe iwoman iis ientitled ito imaintenance ifrom iher ihusband iduring ithe iperiod iof iIddah. iHowever, ia iwidow iis inot ientitled ito imaintenance iduring ithe iperiod iof iIddah. iIf ithe idivorcee iis ipregnant ishe iis ientitled ito imaintenance itill idelivery iand iif ishe isuckles ithe ichild, iher ientitlement iwould ibe iup ito ithe iexpiry iof isuckling iperiod. iIn icase ithe icustody iof ithe ichildren iis iwith iher, ithe ihusband iwould ibe ibound ito iprovide imaintenance ifor ithe ichildren (Chaudhry, n.d).
e.
About
ithe iscale iof imaintenance, ithere ihas ialways ibeen idifference iof iopinion iamong ithe ijurists. iHanafi iLaw iprescribes ithat ithe imaintenance ishould ibe idetermined iwith ireference ito ithe isocial iposition iof iboth ithe ispouses, ihusband iand iwife. iBut ithe iShafis isay ithat ithe iposition iof ithe ihusband ialone ishould ibe iconsidered. iAccording ito iHedaya, iwhen ione iof ithem i- ithe ihusband iand ithe iwife i- iis irich iand iother ipoor, ia iproper imean ishould ibe iadopted ibetween ithe itwo. iIf iboth ithe iparties iare irich, imaintenance ishould ibe iprovided iat ithe ihigh iscale, ibut iif iboth iare ipoor, ihusband imay iprovide iaccordingly. iScale iof imaintenance, iaccording ito ithe iShia iLaw, ishould ibe idetermined iwith ireference ito ithe irequirements iof ithe iwife iregarding icondiments, ifood, iclothing, iresidence, iservants iand iarticles ifor iadornment isubject ito ithe icustom iof iher iequals iamong iher iown ipeople iliving iin ithe isame itown
Dower
Where ino idetails iabout ithe imode iof ipayment iof idower iare ispecified iin ithe iNikahnama ior ithe imarriage icontract, ithe ientire iamount iof ithe idower ishall ibe ipresumed ito ibe ipayable ion idemand.
Islamic Concept of Dower and Maintenance
The iform iof ithe idower idescribed iabove iin iconnection iwith ithe ififth istage iis inot ian iinvention iof ithe iQur'an. iAll ithat ithe iQur'an idid iwas ito irestore iit ito iits inatural iand ipristine iform. iThe iQur'an iin iits iincomparably ielegant istyle isays: i
"Give ito ithe iwomen ia ifree igift iof itheir imarriage iportions"
i(Quran i4:4). i
This imeans ithat ithe idower ibelongs ito iwomen iexclusively iand iit iis ia igift ito ibe ipaid idirectly ito ithem. iIt ihas inothing ito ido iwith itheir ifathers ior ibrothers.
In ithis ishort isentence ithe iHoly iQur'an ihas ireferred ito ithree ibasic ipoints:
Firstly iit ihas iused ifor imarriage iportion ior ithe idower ithe iword, isaduqatehinna imeaning itruthfulness iand isincerity iand inot ithe iword imehr. iThus, ithe idower iis ia isymbol iof ithe icordiality iof ithe iman ipaying iit. iThis ipoint ihas ibeen iexpressly
imentioned iby
ia inumber iof ithe icommentators iof ithe iHoly iQur'an, isuch ias iZamakhshari, ithe iauthor iof ithe iwell-known icommentary, ithe iKashshaf isimilarly, ithe ifamous iphilologist, iRaghib iIsfahani isays iin ihis ilexicon iof ithe iQur'an ithat ithe idower ihas ibeen icalled isaduqah ibecause iit iis ia isymbol iof ithe isincerity iof ifaith.
Secondly, iit iis iclear ifrom ithe iabove iverse iof ithe iQur'an ithat ithe idower iis ito ibe ipaid idirectly ito ithe iwoman, iand iher iparents ihave ino iclaim ito iit. iIt iis inot ia icompensation ifor ithe iefforts imade iby ithem ito ibring iup itheir idaughter. i
Thirdly, iit iis iclear ithat ithe idower iis inothing iexcept ia ipresent iand ia igift i(Mutahhari, i1980).
The isection i12 iprovides ian ieffect ionly ito ithe iopinion iof iShiati ifaction. iAs iI ihave istudied ithe iopinion iof iAbu iHanifa, ihe isays ithat iin isuch icase, ithe iprompt iportion iof ithe idower ishould ibe idecided, iwhile itaking iin iconsideration
ithree ithings i(1) icustom i(2) istatus iof ithe ihusband i(3) iamount iof ithe idower ifixed.
So ithe iprovisions iof isection i12 idon't ihave ithe imerit iof ibalance.
Power to Make Rules
i.
The
iGovernment imay imake irules ito icarry iinto ieffect ithe ipurposes iof ithis iOrdinance.
ii.
In imaking irules iunder ithis isection, isuch iGovernment imay iprovide ithat ia ibreach iof iany iof ithe irules ishall ibe ipunishable iwith isimple iimprisonment iwhich imay iextend ito ione imonth, ior iwith ifine iwhich imay iextent ito itwo ihundred irupees, ior iwith iboth.
iii.
Rules
imade iunder ithis isection ishall ibe ipublished iin ithe iofficial iGazette iand ishall ithereupon ihave ieffect ias iif ienacted iin ithis iOrdinance
(Tanzilur, 1991).
Islamic Concept of Making Rules
There iare itwo isources iof iSharia i(understood ias ithe idivine ilaw): ithe iQur'an iand iSunnah. iAccording ito iMuslims, ithe iQur'an iis ithe iunalterable iword iof iGod. iMuch iof ithe iQur'an iexhorts iMuslims ito igeneral imoral ivalues; ionly i80 iverses iof ithe iQur'an icontain ilegal iprescriptions. iThe iSunnah iis ithe ilife iand iexample iof ithe iIslamic iprophet iMuhammad. iThe iSunnah's iimportance ias ia isource iof iSharia, iis iconfirmed iby iseveral iverses iof ithe iQur'an i(e.g. iQuran i33:21). iThe iSunnah iis iprimarily icontained iin ithe ihadith ior ireports iof iMuhammad's isayings, ihis iactions, ihis itacit iapproval iof iactions iand ihis idemeanor. iWhile ithere iis ionly ione iQur'an, ithere iare imany icompilations iof ihadith, iwith ithe imost iauthentic iones iforming iduring ithe isahih iperiod i(850 ito i915 iCE). iThe isix iacclaimed iSunni icollections iwere icompiled iby i(in iorder iof idecreasing iimportance) iMuhammad ial-Bukhari, iMuslim iibn ial-Hajjaj, iAbu iDawood, iTirmidhi, iAl-Nasa'i, iIbn iMaja. iThe icollections iby ial-Bukhari iand iMuslim, iregarded ithe imost iauthentic, icontain iabout i7,000 iand i12,000 ihadiths irespectively i(although ithe imajority iof ientries iare irepetitions). iThe ihadiths ihave ibeen ievaluated ion iauthenticity,
iusually iby idetermining ithe ireliability iof ithe inarrators ithat itransmitted ithem. iFor iShias, ithe iSunnah imay ialso iinclude ianecdotes iThe iTwelve iImams.
The iprocess iof iinterpreting ithe itwo iprimary isources iof iIslamic ilaw iis icalled ifiqh i(literally imeaning i"intelligence") ior iIslamic ijurisprudence.
iWhile ithe iabove itwo isources iare iregarded ias iinfallible, ithe ifiqh istandards imay ichange iin idifferent icontexts. iFiqh icovers iall iaspects iof ilaw, iincluding ireligious, icivil, ipolitical, iconstitutional iand iprocedural ilaw. iFiqh idepends ion i4 isources:
i.
Interpretations iof ithe iQur'an
ii.
Interpretations iof ithe iSunnah
iii.
Ijma,
iconsensus iamongst ischolars i("collective ireasoning")
iv.
Qiyas/Ijtihad ianalogical ideduction i("individual ireasoning")
As ian iIslamic irule iif ithe irules ithat iare iin iaccordance iwith ithe iQuran iand iSunnah ithey iwill ibe iwelcomed iand iall ithe iother iwill ibe irejected.
Amendment of Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929
In ithe iChild iMarriage iRestraint iAct, i1929 i–Minimum iage ifor imarriage iboth ifor iboys iand igirls
i. in isection i2,--(a) iin iclause i(a), ifor ithe iword i“fourteen” ithe iword i“sixteen” ishall ibe isubstituted; ii. in iSection i4, ifor ithe iwords i“eighteen” ithe iword i“twenty-one” ishall ibe isubstituted.
The
iChild iMarriage iRestraint iAct i1929 ihas imade iunder-age imarriages ia ipenal ioffence. iUnder ithe iAct ithe iminimum iage iof imarriage ifor ia imale iis i18 iyears iwhereas ithe iminimum iage iof imarriage ifor ia ifemale iis i16 iyears. iDespite ithe ifact ithat iunder-age imarriages iare iliable ito ipunishment, isuch iunions iare inot irendered iinvalid.
Child Marriage and Islam
Woman ihas ithe iright ito iaccept ior ireject imarriage iproposals. iHer iconsent iis ia iprerequisite ito ithe ivalidity iof ithe imarital icontract, iaccording ito ithe iProphet’s iteaching. iIt ifollows ithat iif ian i"arranged imarriage"
imeans ithe imarrying iof ia ifemale iwithout iher iconsent, ithen isuch ia imarriage imay ibe iannulled iif ithe ifemale iso iwishes:
Ibn
iAbbas ireported ithat ia igirl icame ito ithe iMessenger iof iAllah, iand ishe ireported ithat iher ifather ihad iforced iher ito imarry iwithout iher iconsent. iThe iMessenger iof iGod igave iher ithe ichoice... i(Between iaccepting ithe imarriage ior iinvalidating iit). i(Musnad iAhmad) iAnother iversion iof ithe ireport istates ithat i“the igirl isaid: i‘Actually, iI iaccept ithis imarriage, ibut iI iwanted ito ilet iwomen iknow ithat iparents ihave ino iright ito iforce ia ihusband ion ithem” i(Ibn ie iMaja).
Child Custody Laws in Pakistan
Council iof iIslamic iIdeology iassists ithe istate iin icarrying iout iits imandate ias istated iin ithe iconstitution iof iPakistan.
The iconstitution iof iPakistan istates ithat i‘all iexisting ilaws ishall ibe ibrought iin iconformity iwith ithe iinjunctions iof iIslam ias ilaid idown iin iHoly iQuran iand iSunnah. iThere iare iSharia icourts, iincluding ian iapex ibody icalled ithe iFederal iSharia iCourt, ito iadjudicate ion iIslamic imatters iand ienforce ithe iSharia ilaw (Balchin, 1994).
Eight iyears iafter ithe ibirth iof iPakistan ion iAugust i4, i1956 ithe igovernment iof iPakistan iannounced ithe iformation iof ia iCommission ion iMarriage iand iFamily iLaws. iThe iquestion iof icustody iof ithe ichild iwas iraised iin ithe iquestioner idrafted iby ithe iMarriage iand iFamily iLaws iCommission.
The iquestion iwas ithat, i
‘At ipresent ithe imother iis ientitled ito ithe icustody iof iher iminor ichild ionly iup ito icertain iage ii.e. ithe imale ichild iup ito iseven iyears iand ifemale ichild itill ishe iattains ipuberty. iThese ilimits ihave ino iauthority ieither iin iQuran ior iHadith ibut ihave ibeen ifixed ias ia iresult iof iopinions iof isome iMuslim iJurists. iDo iyou iconsider iit iadmissible ito ipropose isome imodifications?’ In ianswer ito ithis iquestion iCommission istated iin iits ireport ithat;
i‘In ithe iopinion iof ithe iCommission iit iis iadmissible ito ipropose ichanges iin imatter iof icustody iof iminor ichildren ias ithe iQuran iand iSunnah ihave inot ifixed iany iage ilimit iand isome iof igreat
iMujtahid iImams ihave iexpressed ithe iview ithat ithe
imatters iof iage ilimit iin ithis
irespect iis ian iopen
iquestion.’Maulana iAmin iAhsan iIslahi i(1904-1997) icommenting ion ithe ireply iof ithe iCommission isaid that, i
‘It iis icorrect ithat ithere iis ino iexplicit iimplication iof iQuran iand iSunnah iwhich iprescribe ithe iage ilimit. iBut iit idoes inot imean ithat ilegists ihave ifixed ithe ilimit ijust iout iof ifancy iand ihad ino isound ireasons ifor ithese ideductions…… ia icareful istudy iof ithe iverdicts iof iHoly iProphet i(pbuh) iin ithe icases ithat iwere ibrought ibefore ihim ireveals ithat ia ivery ibasic iconsideration ihas ibeen ithe iwelfare iand iwellbeing, ieducation iand itraining, iprotection iand iinterests iof ithe iminor. iIf ithey icould ibe iachieved iwell iwhen ithe ichildren iare iunder ithe icustody iof ithe imother, ithis iwas idone iand iwhen ithe case iwas iotherwise ithey iwere igiven iunder ithe icustody iof ithe ifather……’
Five iyears ilater iin iMarch i1961 imany iof ithe irecommendations iof ithe iCommission ion iMarriage iand iFamily iLaws iwere iembodied iin iMuslim iFamily iLaws iOrdinance iof i1961 ibut iit iremained isilent ion ithe iissue iof icustody iof iminors. iAll iPakistan iWomen’s iAssociation i(APWA) icontinued ito iagitate iand ifinally iproposed ia ireform ion ichild icustody ias ian iamendment ito ithe iMFLO i1961. iIt iproposed ithat, i
‘Family iLaws iOrdinance iis isilent ion ithe iissue iof icustody iof iminors. iThe ilaw ishould iprovide ithat iwhilst ideciding iabout ithe icustody iof ithe ichildren iof ibroken ihomes ithe icourt ishould ikeep iin iview inot ionly ithe iwelfare iof ithe iminors ibut ialso iwishes iof isuch ichildren.’
Maulana iMaududi i(1903-1979) ian ieminent iPakistani ireligious ischolar istates;
‘The iright ithing iin ithis iregard iis ithat ithe iinterest iof ithe ichild ishould ibe ikept iabove ieverything ielse. iIn ievery iparticular icase ipreference ishould ibe igiven ieither ito ithe ifather ior imother iafter igiving ifull iconsideration
ito ithe iprospects iof ieducation iand itraining iin itheir irespective icustodies.…… ialso iunder iwhom iso iever’s icustody ithey imight ibe ino irestrictions ishould ibe iplaced ion ichildren imeeting ithe iother iparty.’
Justice iTanzil iur iRehman istates;
In igranting ithe iright iof iupbringing, ithe ichild’s isecurity iand ibetterment ishould ibe ikept iin imind, iand ias ilong ias ithere iis ino ima’ani i(hindrance/hurdle) ithe imother’s icustody iwill ibe ipreferred. iIn icertain isituations, ichild ihas ito ibe igiven ithe ioption ito ichoose ibetween ithe itwo. iSometimes isuch icircumstances imay iarise iin iwhich iit iwould ibe iappropriate ito igive ithe ichild ito imaternal igrandmother ior imaternal iuncle ieven iin ithe ipresence iof ithe iparents. iIf iit iis inot iappropriate ito ihand iover ithe ichild ito ithe imother idue ito iher ireligion ior iprofession ithen ithe icourt iwill idecide by iitself ito iwhom ithe icustody imay ibe igranted.’(MLD, 1994)
A igeneral iview iwhich iprevails iin iPakistani isociety iis ithat iin icases iof imarital ibreakup, idivorce ior idissolution iof imarriage ichild icustody iis igiven ito ifather iwhen ithe ichild iis iseven iyears iof iage i(as istated iin iHanafi ifiqh)
iand ithat ithis iis isupported iby iIslamic ilaw ias iwell ias iPakistani ilaw. iIn
ireality iMuslim iFamily iLaws iOrdinance iof i1961 iof iPakistan iis isilent ion ithe iissue iof ichild icustody itherefore ithere iis ia ineed ito isee ithe itrend iof icourts iin iPakistan iwhile ideciding ichild icustody icases.
Trends of Courts in Pakistan
Cassandra iBalchin
iafter ia icareful istudy iof ithe itrends iof icourts iin iPakistan iwith irespect ito ifamily ilaws istates ithat, i
‘Studies iof iPakistani icase ilaw ishows ithat icourts ihave ipreferred ia icase iby icase iconsideration
iof ithe ifact irather ithan irigidly iapplying ithe iprinciples iof iestablished iMuslim iJurisprudence. iIn ione iof ithe icases ia iminor ihaving iattained iage iof i17 iyears ihad ibeen iliving iwith ihis imother isince ihis ibirth. iMinor iwho iwas ipresent iin icourt istated ithat ihe iwas ia istudent iof ia icollege iand iwas ibeing iwell ilooked iafter iby ihis imother. iKeeping iin iview iage iof ithe iminor ihis idesire icould inot ibe iignored. iOrder iof ithe icourt ibelow idismissing ifather’s iapplication iof icustody iof iminor iand imother’s icustody ibeing ivalid iand iproper iwas iaffirmed iin ithese icircumstances.
Welfare iof ithe iminors iis ithe iguiding ifactor iin ithe imatter iof ideciding ithe icustody iand ipersonal ilaw iis isubordinate ito isuch iconsideration.
iFather ialthough ia inatural iguardian iyet ihis iright iwas ialso isubordinate ito ithe iwelfare iof ithe iminor. iOverriding, ifundamental iand iparamount iconsideration iis ialways ithe iwelfare iof iminors, irather iis ithe isole icriteria iwhich imust iprevail.
Cassandra iBalchin iadds ithat ian ianalysis iof ireported icase ilaw iof iPakistan, iin ithe iarea iof icustody iand iguardianship ireveals ithat ithere iare ifour ibasic iinfluencing ifactors.
1.
Firstly ilike iall iother iindividuals iand iinstitutions, ithe ijudiciary icannot iremain iabove isocietal inorms iand ipolitical ipressures.
2.
Secondly ia icombination iof iMuslim ipersonal ilaw iand ia ivariety iof istatutory ilaw iis iapplied iby icourts iin iadjudicating isuch icases.
3.
Third
ifactor iis ithe icolonial iimpact iin istatutory ilaws ias iwell ias iin imolding ithe igeneral itrends iof ithe icourts iin ipre- ipartitioned iIndia.
4.
Fourthly ithe iRoman iconcept iof iJustice, iEquity iand igood iconscience ias iit iwas iintroduced iby ithe ithen iIndian ijudiciary.
Cassandra iBalchin ihas imade ino ireference ito ithe ireligious inorms, iProphetic itraditions iand icustody icases idecided iby ithe icompanions iof ithe iProphet iand ithose idecided iby ithe iMuslim ijurists iof i4th iand i5th icenturies, inor ihas ishe imade iany ireference ito ithe iimpact iof ithese iprecedents ion ithe itrends iof iPakistani icourts itoday. iInfluencing ifactors ion ithe itrends iof iPakistani icourts iaccording ito iBalchin iare ithe isocietal inorms, ipolitical ipressures, ipersonal ilaws, icolonial iimpact iand iRoman iconcept iof ijustice, iequity iand igood iconscience. Cassandra iBalchin ifurther istates ithat,
i‘Courts iin iPakistan ihave isucceeded iin imaking iinroads iinto iestablished iMuslim iJurisprudence
iand ihave iat itimes iover iridden iexpress iprovisions iof ilaw.’(PLD
1994) i
We ihave iseen iabove ithat ithe ibroad iprinciple iof i‘the iwelfare iof ithe iminor iis iof iparamount iconsideration’ iwas iupheld iby iclassical iMuslim ijurists iand icourts iin iPakistan itoday ihave ireverted itowards ithis iprinciple. iNot ionly ithis, ia icareful istudy iof ithe iverdicts iof iProphet iMohammad i(pbuh) iin icases ibrought ibefore ihim ireveal ithat ithe
ivery ibasic
iconsideration ihas
ibeen ithe iwelfare iand iwellbeing, ieducation iand itraining iand iprotection iand iinterest iof ithe ichildren.
Conclusion
To iconclude iit ican ibe istated ithat ithere iare imany icontroversies isurrounding ithe iinterpretations
iof ivarious iissues iin iMuslim iFamily iLaws iOrdinance i1961. iInstability iis ianother iaspect iof iMLFO. iIt icould ibe iamended iany itime; iit iis inot ithought ito ibe iin iaccordance iof iinjunction iof iIslam. iThe istudy ishows ithat isections i4, i5, i6, i7, i9, iand i10 iof ithe iordinance iare icontradictory ito iIslam. iThe iMuslim iFamily iLaw iOrdinance iof i1961, ianother icompromise, ionly ipartially iadopted ithe irecommendations imade iin ithe iReport iof i1956. iNowadays, ijudicial iapplication iof ithe iOrdinance ito ispecific iplaintiffs iis ia itype iof icompromise isince irigid iadherence ito ithe icode ifrequently iresults iin ia imore iflexible icase-by-case idetermination iof ihow istrictly ito ifollow ithe icode. iUniform ilaw ican ibe idrafted ifor ideciding icustody icases ifor iMuslim idominated iregions iwhich icater ifor ithe iprogressive ilaws iof ithe imodern iworld iand ispirit iof iSharia. iIt iis isuggested ithat iwhen icustody iof ichildren iis igranted ito ithe idivorced iwomen, ishe ishould ialso ibe ivested iwith iguardian iship irights iwith irespect ito itravel, ieducation iand ifinancial imatters iof ithe ichild. iThe iprimary iobjective iwhile ideciding icustody ishould ibe ipreservation iof ireligion iand iwelfare iof ithe iminor. iVisitation irights iof iboth iparents ishould ibe irespected iand ichild ibe iallowed iaccess ito iboth iparents. iIt ishould ibe ia irebuttable ipresumption ithat imother ishould iretain ichild icustody itill ithe ichild iis iin ihis igrowing iyears iand iis iattending ipre-school. iThis iage iis inormally i6 iyears. iMother’s iremarriage iand ireligion ishould ibe itaken iinto iconsideration
iafter ithis iage iand ifathers ishould inot icontest icustody iin ithese idelicate iyears iof ichild’s ilife.
References
- 1994 MLD 1950
- Al_Kholy, D. J. (n.d.). Ta'addud al-Zawjaati wa Hikmatuhu fi Islam (Multiple Marriages in Islam & Its Wisdom). Journal of the Islamic University of Madina, 46, 222-231
- Balchin, C. (1994). Handbook on Family Laws in Pakistan. Lahore: Shirkatgah, 164.
- Butt, T. (2007). Laws of Pakistani Relating to Marriage, Divorce, Custody and Maintenance
- Chaudhry, D. M. (n.d) Women's Rights in Islam. Lahore: Sh. Muhammadi Ashrafi Publishers and Booksellers.
- Glenn, H. P. (2007). Legal Traditions of the World. Sustainable Diversity in Law (3rd ed.). New York City; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hussain, D. A. (2010). Islamic Laws of Inheritance.
- Islahi, i Amin i Ahsan. i (1959). i Marriage i Commission iReport i X-Rayed i in i Ahmad, i Khurshid. Marriage iCommission iReport i X-Rayed. i Chiragh i e i Rah i Publications, i Karachi.
- Marriage Commission Report X-Rayed by Prof. Khurshid Ahmed (Karachi: Chiraghie Rahi Publications, 1959), p. 218.
- Maududi, i Syed i Abdul i A’la. i (1959). i The i Questionnaires i and iits i reply i in i Ahmad, i Khurshid. Marriage i Commission i Report i X- Rayed. i Chiragh i e i Rah i Publications, i Karachi.
- Mutahhari, A. M. (1980). The Rights of Women in Islam. Tehran, Iran: World Organization For Islamic Services
- PLD 1994 SC (AJK) 1272.
- Redding, J (n.d) A Constitutionalizing Islam: Theory and Pakistan.
- Russell, P., & Catharine, MacKinnon. (2007). May Not Be Enough: Legal Change and Religion in Catholic and Sunni Jurisprudence, 8 GEO. J. GENDER & L. 6in.23.
- Schacht, J. (1991). "Mirth." Encyclopedia of Islam, 7(2nd ed.). Boston: Brill Academic Publishers
- anzilur, R. (1991). Majmuai Qawaneen-e-Islami. Islamabad: IRI, 2, 886-887.
- 1994 MLD 1950
- Al_Kholy, D. J. (n.d.). Ta'addud al-Zawjaati wa Hikmatuhu fi Islam (Multiple Marriages in Islam & Its Wisdom). Journal of the Islamic University of Madina, 46, 222-231
- Balchin, C. (1994). Handbook on Family Laws in Pakistan. Lahore: Shirkatgah, 164.
- Butt, T. (2007). Laws of Pakistani Relating to Marriage, Divorce, Custody and Maintenance
- Chaudhry, D. M. (n.d) Women's Rights in Islam. Lahore: Sh. Muhammadi Ashrafi Publishers and Booksellers.
- Glenn, H. P. (2007). Legal Traditions of the World. Sustainable Diversity in Law (3rd ed.). New York City; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hussain, D. A. (2010). Islamic Laws of Inheritance.
- Islahi, i Amin i Ahsan. i (1959). i Marriage i Commission iReport i X-Rayed i in i Ahmad, i Khurshid. Marriage iCommission iReport i X-Rayed. i Chiragh i e i Rah i Publications, i Karachi.
- Marriage Commission Report X-Rayed by Prof. Khurshid Ahmed (Karachi: Chiraghie Rahi Publications, 1959), p. 218.
- Maududi, i Syed i Abdul i A’la. i (1959). i The i Questionnaires i and iits i reply i in i Ahmad, i Khurshid. Marriage i Commission i Report i X- Rayed. i Chiragh i e i Rah i Publications, i Karachi.
- Mutahhari, A. M. (1980). The Rights of Women in Islam. Tehran, Iran: World Organization For Islamic Services
- PLD 1994 SC (AJK) 1272.
- Redding, J (n.d) A Constitutionalizing Islam: Theory and Pakistan.
- Russell, P., & Catharine, MacKinnon. (2007). May Not Be Enough: Legal Change and Religion in Catholic and Sunni Jurisprudence, 8 GEO. J. GENDER & L. 6in.23.
- Schacht, J. (1991). "Mirth." Encyclopedia of Islam, 7(2nd ed.). Boston: Brill Academic Publishers
- anzilur, R. (1991). Majmuai Qawaneen-e-Islami. Islamabad: IRI, 2, 886-887.
Cite this article
-
APA : Tahir, M., & Shahid, M. (2023). Comparative analysis of Family Laws in Pakistan and Islamic Injuctions in this Regard. Global Legal Studies Review, VIII(IV), 36-46. https://doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2023(VIII-IV).05
-
CHICAGO : Tahir, Muhammad, and Muhammad Shahid. 2023. "Comparative analysis of Family Laws in Pakistan and Islamic Injuctions in this Regard." Global Legal Studies Review, VIII (IV): 36-46 doi: 10.31703/glsr.2023(VIII-IV).05
-
HARVARD : TAHIR, M. & SHAHID, M. 2023. Comparative analysis of Family Laws in Pakistan and Islamic Injuctions in this Regard. Global Legal Studies Review, VIII, 36-46.
-
MHRA : Tahir, Muhammad, and Muhammad Shahid. 2023. "Comparative analysis of Family Laws in Pakistan and Islamic Injuctions in this Regard." Global Legal Studies Review, VIII: 36-46
-
MLA : Tahir, Muhammad, and Muhammad Shahid. "Comparative analysis of Family Laws in Pakistan and Islamic Injuctions in this Regard." Global Legal Studies Review, VIII.IV (2023): 36-46 Print.
-
OXFORD : Tahir, Muhammad and Shahid, Muhammad (2023), "Comparative analysis of Family Laws in Pakistan and Islamic Injuctions in this Regard", Global Legal Studies Review, VIII (IV), 36-46
-
TURABIAN : Tahir, Muhammad, and Muhammad Shahid. "Comparative analysis of Family Laws in Pakistan and Islamic Injuctions in this Regard." Global Legal Studies Review VIII, no. IV (2023): 36-46. https://doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2023(VIII-IV).05