References

• Andhyarujina, T. R. (2012, August 6). Disturbing trends in judicial activism. The Hindu
• Baar, C. (1990). Social action litigation in India: The operation and limitations of the world's most active judiciary. Policy Studies Journal, 19(1), 140.
• Bag, R. K. (1997). Judicial activism vis-à-vis public administration. The Administrator, XLII (2), 167
• Bakshi, P. M. (1997). Judicial activism: some reflections. The.Administrator, XLII(2), 5.
• Balakrishnan, K. G. (2008). Constitutional Control Praxis in the Present Day. Brazilian Supreme Court, Brasilia.
• Balakrishnan, K. G. (2009, October 14). Judicial activism underIndian constitution (p.4). Dublin, Ireland, Trinity College.
• Bandhua MuktiMorcha v. Union of India, (1984) 2 S.C.R. 67, 13 (India).
• Baxi, U. (1985). Taking suffering seriously: Social action litigation in the Supreme Court of India. Third World Legal Stud., 107.
• Baxi, U.(1980). The Indian Supreme Court and Politics. Eastern Book Co.
• Cassels, J. (1989). Judicial Activism and Public Interest Litigation in India: Attempting the Impossible?. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 37(3), 495-519.
• Chatterji, S. (1997). For public administration: Is judicial activism really deterrent to legislative anarchy and executive tyranny. The Administrator, 42(2), 9.
• Hand, L. (1959). The spirit of liberty: Papers and addresses of Learned Hand. Vintage Books.
• Jariwala, C.M. (1999). Poorman’s access to judicial justice: A reality or myth. Indian Journal of Birchfield, L., & Corsi, J. (2010). The right to life is the right to food: People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India & others. Human Rights Brief, 17(3), 3:15-18 Public Administration, XLV(3), 336.
• Kashyap, S. C. (1994). Our constitution. National Book Trust of India, New Delhi, 49.
• Katju, M. (2012, July 20) Lessons in judicial restraint. The Hindu.
• Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India and Others W.P. (C) Nos. 217, 262, 266, and 305 of 2004 JT 2006 (8) SC 1 (not yet published in AIR or SCC).
• Lakshminath, A. (1997). Jurisprudence of judicial activism. The Administrator, 42(2), 109.
• M. K. Malviya, (2013) Independent Judiciary: A Study in Indian Perspective. Bharati Law Review, July – Sept., p. 113
• M.C Mehta v State of Tamilnadu AIR 1991 SC 417
• M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, (1987) 1 S.C.R. 819
• Sathe. S.P. (2005). Judicial Activism in India: Transgressing Borders and Enforcing Limits. Mozoomdar, A. (1999). The Indian Federal State and its Future. VA PaiPanandiker and AshisNandy (New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill, 1999), 261- 296.Oxford University Press.
• Semwal, M. M., & Khosla, S. (2008). Judicial activism. The Indian Journal of Political Science, LXIX(I), 118.
• Sheela Barse v. Union of India, (1988) Supp. 2 S.C.R. 643,
• Vineet Narain, A.I.R. 1996 S.C.3386