References

• Babcock, L., & Pogarsky, G. (1999). Damage Caps and Settlement: A Behavioral Approach. The Journal of Legal Studies, 28(2), 341–370. https://doi.org/10.1086/468054
• Boyd, C. L., Epstein, Lee, & Martin, A. D. (2010). “Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging.” American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 389–411.
• Dalton, B. (2014). 5 Common Personality Types for Lawyers & Attorneys. Retrieved from Insights 5-common-personality-types-for-lawyers- and-attorneys
• Maxwell, M., Sidman, A. H., & Udi, S. (2013). Is Certiorari Contingent on Litigant Behavior? Petitioners' Role in Strategic Auditing. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 10(1), 54- 75, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2203214
• Nyikos, S. A. (2003). The Preliminary Reference Process: National Court Implementation, Changing Opportunity Structures and Litigant Desistment. European Union Politics, 4(4), 397– 419. https://doi.org/10.1177/146511650344002
• Peresie, J. L. (2005). “Female Judges Matter: Gender and Collegial Decision Making in the Federal Appellate Courts.” Yale Law Journal 114 (7), 1759– 90.
• Parella, K. (2019). Public relations litigation. Vand. L. Rev., 72, 1285.
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). A resource dependence perspective. In Intercorporate relations. The structural analysis of business. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Segal, J. A. (2002). “Representative Decision Making on the Federal Bench: Clinton's District Court Appointees.” Political Research Quarterly, 53(137), 142–47.
• Songer, D. R., & Crews-Meyer, K. A. (2000). “Does Judge Gender Matter? Decision Making in State Supreme Courts.” Social Science Quarterly, 81 (3), 750–62.
• Walker, T. G., & Barrow, D. J. (1985). “The Diversification of the Federal Bench: Policy and Process Ramifications.” Journal of Politics, 47 (2), 596–617.
• Wofford, C. B. (2017). Avoiding Adversariness? The Effects of Gender on Litigant Decision- Making. Politics & Gender, 13(4), 656–682. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X17000071