References

• Act, C. P. (1947)
• Alsop, J. D. (1982). The theory and practice of Tudor taxation. The English Historical Review, 97(382), 1-30.
• Blackstone, S. W. (1778). Commentaries on the laws of England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Block, J. D. (1946). Suits Against Government Officers and the Sovereign Immunity Doctrine. Harvard Law Review, 59(7), 1060-1086.
• Chang, E. (2007). Presidential Immunity: A Survey of United States Cases. Taiwan International Studies Quarterly, 3(1), 149-170
• hemerinsky, E. (2001). Against Sovereign Immunity. Stanford Law Review, 53, 1201-1224. Clinton v. Jones, (Washington 1997). 520
• Ehlrich, L. (1921). Proceedings against the crown. London: Oxford, 1216 - 1377
• Halsbury's Laws of England (5th ed., Vol. 1). (2014). New York: LexisNexis.
• Hansen, W. C. (1994). National Security Law and the Power of the Purse. Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Holdsworth, S. W. (1909). A History of English Law (Vol. 1). London: Methuen.
• Isenbergh, J. (1998). Impeachment and Presidential Immunity from Judicial Process. Chicago: University of Chicago.
• Jackson, V. C. (2003). Suing the Federal Government: Sovereignty, Immunity, and Judicial Independence. The Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev, 35, 521-609.
• Lord, H. (1984). Halsbury's laws of England. London: Butter worths
• McKechnie, W. S. (1914). Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John. Glasgow:
• Motos, J. (1998). Failing to Score: Clinton v. Jones and Claims of Presidential Immunity. Mercer Law Review, 49(Winter), 583-594.
• Pugh, G. W. (1953). Historical Approach to the doctrine of sovereign Immunity. Louisiana Law Review, 13(3), 479-494.
• Spalding v. Vilas. (1896). 161
• Theodore, J. L. (2006). Federal Sovereign Immunity. Cambridge US: Harvard Law School.
• Tidmarsh, P. F. (2009). The Appropriations power and sovereign Immunity. Michigan Law Review, 107, 1207-1268.
• United States v. Clarke, 33 (1834).