THE WORKABLE MODALITIES OF ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN PAKISTAN

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2020(V-III).05      10.31703/glsr.2020(V-III).05      Published : Sep 2020
Authored by : Khushbakht Qaiser , Zarfishan Qaiser , Usman Hameed

05 Pages : 39-46

References

  • Cortes, P. (2013).
  • Cortes, P. (2011). 'Online Dispute Resolution for consumes in the Pakistan a Union', (Routledge,).
  • Criminal Proceedings against Lindqvist (C-101/01) [2003] E.C.R. I-12971; [2004] 1 C.M.L.R. 20.
  • Esteban de la, F. (2013).
  • Golden Eye International Ltd v Telefonica [2012] EWHC 723 (Ch); [2013] E.M.L.R. 1.
  • Hornle, J. (2013).
  • Hornle. (2009). Cross-border Internet Dispute Resolution
  • Heinz Huber v Germany (C-524/06) [2008] E.C.R. I-9705; [2009] 1 C.M.L.R. 49
  • Halsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust [2004] 1 W.L.R. 3002 CA (Civ Div)
  • Hannelore Spitzley v. Sommer Exploitation SA (Case 48/84) [1985] E.C.R. 787, [1985] 2 C.M.L.R. 507
  • Hodges, B., & Creutzfeldt-Banda. (2012). Consumer ADR in Pakistan (2012) https://fp.brecorder.com/2019/05/20190501468778/.
  • Internationaler Hilfsfond v Commission (T-300/10) May 22, 2012 at [117]
  • Rehman, K. K. U. (2018) http://www.pja.gov.pk/system/files/Cyber_Laws_in_Pakistan_Justice_(R)_Khalil_ur _Rehman_Khan.pdf.
  • Katsh, E. (2006). www.lex-electronica.org/articles/v10- 3/katsh.htm.
  • Katsh, E., & Rifkin, J. (2001). Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflict in Cyberspace, (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).
  • Kohler, K., & Schultz. (2004). Online Dispute Resolution: Challenges for Contemporary Justice (Netherlands: Kluwer Law International).
  • Leahy, E., & Bianchi, C. (2000).
  • Philippe, M. (2010).
  • Morek. (2006).
  • Orji, U. (2012).
  • Rabinovich-Einy,
  • Palmer, M., & Roberts, S. (1998). Dispute Process, (Butterworths, London).
  • Schultz, T. (2004).
  • Wang, F. F. (2009). Online Dispute Resolution: Technology, management and legal practice from an international perspective, Chandos Publishing (Oxford) Limited.
  • Cortes, P. (2013).
  • Cortes, P. (2011). 'Online Dispute Resolution for consumes in the Pakistan a Union', (Routledge,).
  • Criminal Proceedings against Lindqvist (C-101/01) [2003] E.C.R. I-12971; [2004] 1 C.M.L.R. 20.
  • Esteban de la, F. (2013).
  • Golden Eye International Ltd v Telefonica [2012] EWHC 723 (Ch); [2013] E.M.L.R. 1.
  • Hornle, J. (2013).
  • Hornle. (2009). Cross-border Internet Dispute Resolution
  • Heinz Huber v Germany (C-524/06) [2008] E.C.R. I-9705; [2009] 1 C.M.L.R. 49
  • Halsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust [2004] 1 W.L.R. 3002 CA (Civ Div)
  • Hannelore Spitzley v. Sommer Exploitation SA (Case 48/84) [1985] E.C.R. 787, [1985] 2 C.M.L.R. 507
  • Hodges, B., & Creutzfeldt-Banda. (2012). Consumer ADR in Pakistan (2012) https://fp.brecorder.com/2019/05/20190501468778/.
  • Internationaler Hilfsfond v Commission (T-300/10) May 22, 2012 at [117]
  • Rehman, K. K. U. (2018) http://www.pja.gov.pk/system/files/Cyber_Laws_in_Pakistan_Justice_(R)_Khalil_ur _Rehman_Khan.pdf.
  • Katsh, E. (2006). www.lex-electronica.org/articles/v10- 3/katsh.htm.
  • Katsh, E., & Rifkin, J. (2001). Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflict in Cyberspace, (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).
  • Kohler, K., & Schultz. (2004). Online Dispute Resolution: Challenges for Contemporary Justice (Netherlands: Kluwer Law International).
  • Leahy, E., & Bianchi, C. (2000).
  • Philippe, M. (2010).
  • Morek. (2006).
  • Orji, U. (2012).
  • Rabinovich-Einy,
  • Palmer, M., & Roberts, S. (1998). Dispute Process, (Butterworths, London).
  • Schultz, T. (2004).
  • Wang, F. F. (2009). Online Dispute Resolution: Technology, management and legal practice from an international perspective, Chandos Publishing (Oxford) Limited.

Cite this article

    CHICAGO : Qaiser, Khushbakht, Zarfishan Qaiser, and Usman Hameed. 2020. "The Workable Modalities of Online Dispute Resolution in Pakistan." Global Legal Studies Review, V (III): 39-46 doi: 10.31703/glsr.2020(V-III).05
    HARVARD : QAISER, K., QAISER, Z. & HAMEED, U. 2020. The Workable Modalities of Online Dispute Resolution in Pakistan. Global Legal Studies Review, V, 39-46.
    MHRA : Qaiser, Khushbakht, Zarfishan Qaiser, and Usman Hameed. 2020. "The Workable Modalities of Online Dispute Resolution in Pakistan." Global Legal Studies Review, V: 39-46
    MLA : Qaiser, Khushbakht, Zarfishan Qaiser, and Usman Hameed. "The Workable Modalities of Online Dispute Resolution in Pakistan." Global Legal Studies Review, V.III (2020): 39-46 Print.
    OXFORD : Qaiser, Khushbakht, Qaiser, Zarfishan, and Hameed, Usman (2020), "The Workable Modalities of Online Dispute Resolution in Pakistan", Global Legal Studies Review, V (III), 39-46
    TURABIAN : Qaiser, Khushbakht, Zarfishan Qaiser, and Usman Hameed. "The Workable Modalities of Online Dispute Resolution in Pakistan." Global Legal Studies Review V, no. III (2020): 39-46. https://doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2020(V-III).05